Hybridity and Precarious Personhood: Limited Partnerships and Indigenous Economic Development

Indigenous governments in Canada use sophisticated corporate structures to achieve their various economic development goals, of which the limited partnership is most certainly the most common. In a series of recent cases on the personhood of both Indigenous parties and on limited partnerships, courts have been redefining the relationship of personhood and property in the context of limited partnerships. This article canvasses developments in the case law of the personhood of Indigenous peoples alongside similar developments surrounding the nature of limited partnerships, raising questions about the ways that Indigenous governments may be further constrained by formerly unidentified colonial aspects of the law, as well as to identify specific issues that both general and limited partners need to confront before turning to this common business vehicle . The paper closes with some observations about colonial trends in the law governing the use of associations and business structures, posing questions for future research about the policy objectives at play.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Manitoba Law Journal
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29173/mlj1490
Primary Topic
Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybridity and Precarious Personhood: Limited Partnerships and Indigenous Economic Development

Bradley Bryan
Manitoba Law Journal
Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies
article

Hybridity and Precarious Personhood: Limited Partnerships and Indigenous Economic Development

Bradley Bryan
article en

Abstract

Indigenous governments in Canada use sophisticated corporate structures to achieve their various economic development goals, of which the limited partnership is most certainly the most common. In a series of recent cases on the personhood of both Indigenous parties and on limited partnerships, courts have been redefining the relationship of personhood and property in the context of limited partnerships. This article canvasses developments in the case law of the personhood of Indigenous peoples alongside similar developments surrounding the nature of limited partnerships, raising questions about the ways that Indigenous governments may be further constrained by formerly unidentified colonial aspects of the law, as well as to identify specific issues that both general and limited partners need to confront before turning to this common business vehicle . The paper closes with some observations about colonial trends in the law governing the use of associations and business structures, posing questions for future research about the policy objectives at play.

Manitoba Law JournalVol. 46(7)
Harvard Kennedy School
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.