Saving the Farm: A Comparative Analysis of the Farmers’ Creditors Arrangement Act in Manitoba and Ontario

The Great Depression and Dust Bowl of the 1930s caused great hardship for many Canadian farmers, especially in the Prairie Provinces. In response to falling prices and crop yields, as well as increasing debt levels, Parliament enacted the Farmers’ Creditors Arrangement Act (FCAA). The mandate of the bold, new statute was to keep farmers on the land by reducing and rescheduling debts to suit the productive value of the farmland and the capacity of the farmer to pay. There is little academic scholarship that examines the FCAA and how it functioned in practice. This article builds on an earlier pilot study of FCAA case files in two Manitoba counties and widens the empirical lens to consider applications from several more Manitoba counties as well as two Ontario counties. It offers the first analysis of how the FCAA operated in Ontario, employing both quantitative and qualitative data to provide a rich commentary, using examples of actual farmers. The analysis reveals that the application of the FCAA was strongly influenced by local, county-level factors. Rather surprisingly, there were few factors that can be attributed to differences between the two provinces more generally, notwithstanding the fact that there are notable variations in farming practices, operations, and conditions in Ontario, a non-prairie province, and Manitoba, a prairie province. A secondary finding is that, in general, the compromises formulated under the FCAA were highly tailored to the individual farmer’s circumstances. However, there were nevertheless pockets of case files where a fairly uniform approach was used to resolve the financial hardship of farmers who were, seemingly, all in quite similar circumstances. Accordingly, the picture that emerges is complex. FCAA practice evinces stark contrasts — generating compromises which could be either bespoke or boilerplate — and limiting the extent to which one can generalize based on the empirical data from individual counties or regions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Manitoba Law Journal
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29173/mlj1488
Primary Topic
Cooperative Studies and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Saving the Farm: A Comparative Analysis of the Farmers’ Creditors Arrangement Act in Manitoba and Ontario

Virginia Torrie
Manitoba Law Journal
Cooperative Studies and Economics
article

Saving the Farm: A Comparative Analysis of the Farmers’ Creditors Arrangement Act in Manitoba and Ontario

Virginia Torrie
article en

Abstract

The Great Depression and Dust Bowl of the 1930s caused great hardship for many Canadian farmers, especially in the Prairie Provinces. In response to falling prices and crop yields, as well as increasing debt levels, Parliament enacted the Farmers’ Creditors Arrangement Act (FCAA). The mandate of the bold, new statute was to keep farmers on the land by reducing and rescheduling debts to suit the productive value of the farmland and the capacity of the farmer to pay. There is little academic scholarship that examines the FCAA and how it functioned in practice. This article builds on an earlier pilot study of FCAA case files in two Manitoba counties and widens the empirical lens to consider applications from several more Manitoba counties as well as two Ontario counties. It offers the first analysis of how the FCAA operated in Ontario, employing both quantitative and qualitative data to provide a rich commentary, using examples of actual farmers. The analysis reveals that the application of the FCAA was strongly influenced by local, county-level factors. Rather surprisingly, there were few factors that can be attributed to differences between the two provinces more generally, notwithstanding the fact that there are notable variations in farming practices, operations, and conditions in Ontario, a non-prairie province, and Manitoba, a prairie province. A secondary finding is that, in general, the compromises formulated under the FCAA were highly tailored to the individual farmer’s circumstances. However, there were nevertheless pockets of case files where a fairly uniform approach was used to resolve the financial hardship of farmers who were, seemingly, all in quite similar circumstances. Accordingly, the picture that emerges is complex. FCAA practice evinces stark contrasts — generating compromises which could be either bespoke or boilerplate — and limiting the extent to which one can generalize based on the empirical data from individual counties or regions.

Manitoba Law JournalVol. 46(7)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cooperative Studies and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Saving the Farm: A Comparative Analysis of the Farmers’ Creditors Arrangement Act in Manitoba and Ontario — Virginia Torrie · Manitoba Law Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS