Preface and Issue Overview

This issue of the Manitoba Law Journal is our annual Underneath the Golden Boy edition. This means that the contributions in this volume are largely focused on the actions taken by, and issues around, the legislative and executive branches of government, rather than focusing on the courts. In Andrew Flavelle Martin’s first contribution in this volume (“Loyalty, Conscience, and Withdrawal: Are Government Lawyers Different?”), the author considers the somewhat unique”” position of government lawyers when the client asks the lawyer to do something that the lawyer considers unethical. Martin believes that there are unique scenarios that can arise for government lawyers. He goes on to consider the obligations of the Attorney General when his or her Cabinet colleagues (or others within government) make demands of him or her that are inconsistent with the ethical obligations of the Attorney General as a lawyer, or which so violate the conscience of the lawyer that continued representation of the client becomes difficult or impossible

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Manitoba Law Journal
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29173/mlj1448
Primary Topic
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preface and Issue Overview

Bryan P. Schwartz, Darcy L. MacPherson
Manitoba Law Journal
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
article

Preface and Issue Overview

Bryan P. Schwartz, Darcy L. MacPherson
article en

Abstract

This issue of the Manitoba Law Journal is our annual Underneath the Golden Boy edition. This means that the contributions in this volume are largely focused on the actions taken by, and issues around, the legislative and executive branches of government, rather than focusing on the courts. In Andrew Flavelle Martin’s first contribution in this volume (“Loyalty, Conscience, and Withdrawal: Are Government Lawyers Different?”), the author considers the somewhat unique”” position of government lawyers when the client asks the lawyer to do something that the lawyer considers unethical. Martin believes that there are unique scenarios that can arise for government lawyers. He goes on to consider the obligations of the Attorney General when his or her Cabinet colleagues (or others within government) make demands of him or her that are inconsistent with the ethical obligations of the Attorney General as a lawyer, or which so violate the conscience of the lawyer that continued representation of the client becomes difficult or impossible

Manitoba Law JournalVol. 46(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Preface and Issue Overview — Bryan P. Schwartz, Darcy L. MacPherson · Manitoba Law Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS