Modern Finance-Centric Governance: the 2022 Emergency Measures, Property and Financial Powers

A distinctively financial hammer was used to shutter the February 2022 public order emergency. Bank accounts were frozen, donation conduits were squeezed, financial intermediaries were placed under surveillance, and protestors and their financial supporters were met with the risk of severe sanctions. While this tethering of finance and property to end the 2022 Convoy uprising elicits a certain surprise, it is also familiar territory: it sits well within modern crime control policy. The greater surprise is not the type of hammer but the finding of this tool within the box of federal emergency powers that might be leveraged to deal with a public order emergency. This brief note examines the distinct finance and property related measures used in 2022 and their relationship to the federal Emergencies Act. It recommends that Parliament engage in careful deliberation over the appropriateness of financial and property measures for responding to a public order emergency, that the permissibility of such measures be clearly specified and constrained by the statutory language of s. 19(1) and that s. 19(1) be further amended to explicitly require review for Charter compliance of all emergency measures prior to any implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Manitoba Law Journal
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29173/mlj1438
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modern Finance-Centric Governance: the 2022 Emergency Measures, Property and Financial Powers

Michelle Gallant
Manitoba Law Journal
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

Modern Finance-Centric Governance: the 2022 Emergency Measures, Property and Financial Powers

Michelle Gallant
article en

Abstract

A distinctively financial hammer was used to shutter the February 2022 public order emergency. Bank accounts were frozen, donation conduits were squeezed, financial intermediaries were placed under surveillance, and protestors and their financial supporters were met with the risk of severe sanctions. While this tethering of finance and property to end the 2022 Convoy uprising elicits a certain surprise, it is also familiar territory: it sits well within modern crime control policy. The greater surprise is not the type of hammer but the finding of this tool within the box of federal emergency powers that might be leveraged to deal with a public order emergency. This brief note examines the distinct finance and property related measures used in 2022 and their relationship to the federal Emergencies Act. It recommends that Parliament engage in careful deliberation over the appropriateness of financial and property measures for responding to a public order emergency, that the permissibility of such measures be clearly specified and constrained by the statutory language of s. 19(1) and that s. 19(1) be further amended to explicitly require review for Charter compliance of all emergency measures prior to any implementation.

Manitoba Law JournalVol. 46(1)
University of Manitoba (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.