The challenge of science in the face of polarization around recreational hunting and wildlife management

Abstract Science is currently confronting a loss of prestige in the face of the proliferation of subjective “ truths ”. In a world saturated with information, verifiable facts are giving way to personal and collective beliefs that are amplified by biases in the media and on social networks. This undermines confidence in the scientific method and encourages disinformation and social polarization, all of which weaken constructive dialogue among sectors on many key issues. One emblematic case of this disconnection between science and social perception is recreational hunting. This activity is seen by some as essential for conservation, while others view it as harmful and obsolete. Wildlife science is often instrumentalized or delegitimized by both extremes, thus perpetuating a harmful cycle of mistrust and confrontation. In this perspective paper we highlight how this phenomenon reflects a greater problem: the challenge of reconciling science with an increasingly fragmented society that is polarized by post-truth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Wildlife Research
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-025-01983-8
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The challenge of science in the face of polarization around recreational hunting and wildlife management

Pablo Ferreras, Beatriz Arroyo, Jaime Rodríguez‐Estival, Pelayo Acevedo et al.
2 citations
European Journal of Wildlife Research
Geographies of human-animal interactions
13.44
article

The challenge of science in the face of polarization around recreational hunting and wildlife management

Pablo Ferreras, Beatriz Arroyo, Jaime Rodríguez‐Estival, Pelayo Acevedo, Christian Gortázar, Joaquín Vicente, Rafael Mateo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Science is currently confronting a loss of prestige in the face of the proliferation of subjective “ truths ”. In a world saturated with information, verifiable facts are giving way to personal and collective beliefs that are amplified by biases in the media and on social networks. This undermines confidence in the scientific method and encourages disinformation and social polarization, all of which weaken constructive dialogue among sectors on many key issues. One emblematic case of this disconnection between science and social perception is recreational hunting. This activity is seen by some as essential for conservation, while others view it as harmful and obsolete. Wildlife science is often instrumentalized or delegitimized by both extremes, thus perpetuating a harmful cycle of mistrust and confrontation. In this perspective paper we highlight how this phenomenon reflects a greater problem: the challenge of reconciling science with an increasingly fragmented society that is polarized by post-truth.

European Journal of Wildlife ResearchVol. 71(5)
Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
13.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The challenge of science in the face of polarization around recreational hunting and wildlife management — Pablo Ferreras, Beatriz Arroyo, et al. · European Journal of Wildlife Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS