“It’ll Never Work!”

Claims that socialism is infeasible are pervasive in everyday political discourse. These claims warrant close scrutiny, as they often rely on or suggest implicit arguments that are defective and ideologically loaded. This paper systematically reconstructs and critiques five common types of defective anti-socialist feasibility arguments (DAFAs) found in ordinary communication. In addition to analyzing their argumentative flaws, the paper argues that DAFAs function ideologically in the Marxist-critical sense: they distort social reality such that, in effect, they advance and sustain ruling class interests. Relying on fallacies, unsubstantiated claims, and conceptual imprecision, DAFAs misleadingly cultivate the perception that socialism is definitively unachievable and unworthy of deliberation or pursuit, thereby discouraging collective efforts toward emancipatory change. The paper offers analytical tools for identifying and countering such arguments, equipping radicals to more effectively challenge this form of capitalist ideology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Radical Philosophy Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5840/radphilrev2025826160
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“It’ll Never Work!”

John M. Sweet
Radical Philosophy Review
Political Economy and Marxism
article

“It’ll Never Work!”

John M. Sweet
article en

Abstract

Claims that socialism is infeasible are pervasive in everyday political discourse. These claims warrant close scrutiny, as they often rely on or suggest implicit arguments that are defective and ideologically loaded. This paper systematically reconstructs and critiques five common types of defective anti-socialist feasibility arguments (DAFAs) found in ordinary communication. In addition to analyzing their argumentative flaws, the paper argues that DAFAs function ideologically in the Marxist-critical sense: they distort social reality such that, in effect, they advance and sustain ruling class interests. Relying on fallacies, unsubstantiated claims, and conceptual imprecision, DAFAs misleadingly cultivate the perception that socialism is definitively unachievable and unworthy of deliberation or pursuit, thereby discouraging collective efforts toward emancipatory change. The paper offers analytical tools for identifying and countering such arguments, equipping radicals to more effectively challenge this form of capitalist ideology.

Radical Philosophy ReviewVol. 28(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.