A Study on Middle School Students’ Perceptions of Repeating Decimal Representations of Rational Numbers

This study aims to examine how the achievement standards, teaching and learning methods, and considerations related to the representation of rational numbers as repeating decimals—outlined in the national mathematics curriculum—are implemented in textbooks, and how students perceive them. To this end, pre-tasks and interviews were conducted with ninth-grade students who had studied repeating decimals. The study revealed that some students understood the relationship between terminating and repeating decimals differently from how it is described in the textbook. While some students distinguished between “fractions that can be expressed as repeating decimals” and “fractions that can only be expressed as repeating decimals,” they often only recognized the linguistic distinction without understanding the mathematical differences or the reasons behind these expressions. Additionally, some students stated that they would follow the intent of the textbook or test-maker even when it conflicted with their own reasoning, and expressed views that there could be ambiguous aspects in mathematics, as well as opinions that the textbook’s definition of repeating decimals needs to be revised. These findings suggest the need to critically reconsider the pedagogical validity of classifying terminating decimals as fractions that cannot be expressed as repeating decimals. As new textbooks are being developed under the 2022 revised curriculum, it is essential to reflect students' perspectives and problem-solving processes, and to interpret the meaning of the curriculum’s achievement standard explanations with greater precision.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57090/sm.2025.06.27.2.283
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on Middle School Students’ Perceptions of Repeating Decimal Representations of Rational Numbers

Seungju Baek
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
article

A Study on Middle School Students’ Perceptions of Repeating Decimal Representations of Rational Numbers

Seungju Baek
article en

Abstract

This study aims to examine how the achievement standards, teaching and learning methods, and considerations related to the representation of rational numbers as repeating decimals—outlined in the national mathematics curriculum—are implemented in textbooks, and how students perceive them. To this end, pre-tasks and interviews were conducted with ninth-grade students who had studied repeating decimals. The study revealed that some students understood the relationship between terminating and repeating decimals differently from how it is described in the textbook. While some students distinguished between “fractions that can be expressed as repeating decimals” and “fractions that can only be expressed as repeating decimals,” they often only recognized the linguistic distinction without understanding the mathematical differences or the reasons behind these expressions. Additionally, some students stated that they would follow the intent of the textbook or test-maker even when it conflicted with their own reasoning, and expressed views that there could be ambiguous aspects in mathematics, as well as opinions that the textbook’s definition of repeating decimals needs to be revised. These findings suggest the need to critically reconsider the pedagogical validity of classifying terminating decimals as fractions that cannot be expressed as repeating decimals. As new textbooks are being developed under the 2022 revised curriculum, it is essential to reflect students' perspectives and problem-solving processes, and to interpret the meaning of the curriculum’s achievement standard explanations with greater precision.

Vol. 27(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.