Dialog for the Sake of Dialog: Obstacles to China– <scp>EU</scp> Climate and Environmental Cooperation

ABSTRACT In light of the United States' withdrawal from and re‐entry into the Paris Agreement, climate relations between the European Union and China warrant closer inspection. As the second‐ and third‐largest cumulative emitters after the United States, their cooperation has a global impact. This paper assesses the current state of their climate and environmental engagement and analyzes post‐COVID‐19 obstacles affecting this dimension of their relations. Based on interview data, we show that the increasing institutionalization of climate and environmental cooperation has not resulted in improved outcomes. Instead, such engagement remains limited to dialog for the sake of dialog rather than substantive collaboration. We identify four key obstacles to cooperation: perceptual, capacity‐related, institutional, and interest‐based. This paper addresses pertinent questions about the viability and practicality of joint climate action in the context of rising geopolitical tensions. Our findings contribute to scholarship on global climate governance and EU–China relations, and we propose an analytical framework to inform future research and policy debate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Policy
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70071
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dialog for the Sake of Dialog: Obstacles to China– EU Climate and Environmental Cooperation

Wiebke Rabe, Barbara Pongratz
Global Policy
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Dialog for the Sake of Dialog: Obstacles to China– EU Climate and Environmental Cooperation

Wiebke Rabe, Barbara Pongratz
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In light of the United States' withdrawal from and re‐entry into the Paris Agreement, climate relations between the European Union and China warrant closer inspection. As the second‐ and third‐largest cumulative emitters after the United States, their cooperation has a global impact. This paper assesses the current state of their climate and environmental engagement and analyzes post‐COVID‐19 obstacles affecting this dimension of their relations. Based on interview data, we show that the increasing institutionalization of climate and environmental cooperation has not resulted in improved outcomes. Instead, such engagement remains limited to dialog for the sake of dialog rather than substantive collaboration. We identify four key obstacles to cooperation: perceptual, capacity‐related, institutional, and interest‐based. This paper addresses pertinent questions about the viability and practicality of joint climate action in the context of rising geopolitical tensions. Our findings contribute to scholarship on global climate governance and EU–China relations, and we propose an analytical framework to inform future research and policy debate.

Global PolicyVol. 16(5)
International University (KH)
Universität Bremen
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dialog for the Sake of Dialog: Obstacles to China– <scp>EU</scp> Climate and Environmental Cooperation — Wiebke Rabe, Barbara Pongratz · Global Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS