Backup power or bill savings? How electricity tariffs impact residential solar-plus-storage usage in the United States

Adoption of paired solar-plus-storage systems has accelerated in recent years, driven by both the demand for backup power and a desire to manage utility bills. Tradeoffs between those two uses can arise through the reserve setting on the battery storage system, which serves to maintain a minimum state of charge in case of a power interruption. Our paper applies an economic framework to evaluate this tradeoff in terms of changes in bill savings and customer reliability value across reserve levels, considering how those tradeoffs depend on the underlying electricity rate structure and levels. The analysis is based on a representative set of load profiles, solar profiles, tariff designs, and stochastic power interruption events across ten different regions in the United States. We find that the opportunity cost of holding storage capacity in reserve, in terms of foregone bill reductions, outweighs any gains in reliability value from mitigated power interruptions in the majority of customer situations. Higher storage reserve levels increase total customer value only in specific circumstances, such as for customers with inferior reliability (10x average interruptions), with a very high value of lost load ($50/kWh), and with tariff or interconnection rules that disallow grid charging. However, even this result is dampened when considering tariff designs with higher price differentials that increase the opportunity cost of holding storage in reserve (e.g. import/export or time-of-use rates). Allowing grid charging in tariffs essentially eliminates the necessity to hold any storage in reserve in all sensitivity cases explored. • Residential solar and storage usage trades off bill savings and backup power. • Opportunity cost of holding storage in reserve outweighs reliability value. • Result flips for customers with high value of lost load and poor reliability. • Allowing grid charging largely eliminates need to hold storage in reserve. • Storage degradation model choice can impact findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Utilities Policy
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2025.102035
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Smart Grid Energy Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Backup power or bill savings? How electricity tariffs impact residential solar-plus-storage usage in the United States

Sunhee Baik, Galen Barbose, Cesca Miller, Juan Pablo Carvallo et al.
1 citations
Utilities Policy
Smart Grid Energy Management
0.73
article

Backup power or bill savings? How electricity tariffs impact residential solar-plus-storage usage in the United States

Sunhee Baik, Galen Barbose, Cesca Miller, Juan Pablo Carvallo, Will Gorman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Adoption of paired solar-plus-storage systems has accelerated in recent years, driven by both the demand for backup power and a desire to manage utility bills. Tradeoffs between those two uses can arise through the reserve setting on the battery storage system, which serves to maintain a minimum state of charge in case of a power interruption. Our paper applies an economic framework to evaluate this tradeoff in terms of changes in bill savings and customer reliability value across reserve levels, considering how those tradeoffs depend on the underlying electricity rate structure and levels. The analysis is based on a representative set of load profiles, solar profiles, tariff designs, and stochastic power interruption events across ten different regions in the United States. We find that the opportunity cost of holding storage capacity in reserve, in terms of foregone bill reductions, outweighs any gains in reliability value from mitigated power interruptions in the majority of customer situations. Higher storage reserve levels increase total customer value only in specific circumstances, such as for customers with inferior reliability (10x average interruptions), with a very high value of lost load ($50/kWh), and with tariff or interconnection rules that disallow grid charging. However, even this result is dampened when considering tariff designs with higher price differentials that increase the opportunity cost of holding storage in reserve (e.g. import/export or time-of-use rates). Allowing grid charging in tariffs essentially eliminates the necessity to hold any storage in reserve in all sensitivity cases explored. • Residential solar and storage usage trades off bill savings and backup power. • Opportunity cost of holding storage in reserve outweighs reliability value. • Result flips for customers with high value of lost load and poor reliability. • Allowing grid charging largely eliminates need to hold storage in reserve. • Storage degradation model choice can impact findings.

Utilities PolicyVol. 96
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Solar Energy Technologies Office
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Smart Grid Energy Management
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.