Sinking peatlands: Optimal control of subsidence

Abstract Land subsidence threatens the living conditions of about 1.2 billion people worldwide in deltaic regions characterized by soft top soil. Economic activity in these areas requires lowering groundwater levels to keep the land sufficiently dry, which leaves future generations worse off by accelerating subsidence and increasing future costs. This paper provides a model that recognizes this trade‐off and yields analytical expressions for the groundwater level paths that optimally manage the dynamics of subsidence in agricultural lands. Applying our model to the paradigm case of Dutch peatlands, we find that accounting for dynamic efficiency increases welfare by more than 2.5% compared to a myopic benchmark, and these gains can be about 10% within reasonable parameter ranges. Our results support current proposals to reduce subsidence, even without considering additional social benefits from avoided carbon dioxide emissions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.70010
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sinking peatlands: Optimal control of subsidence

Suphi Şen, Hans‐Peter Weikard, Dewy Verhoeven
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Sinking peatlands: Optimal control of subsidence

Suphi Şen, Hans‐Peter Weikard, Dewy Verhoeven
article en

Abstract

Abstract Land subsidence threatens the living conditions of about 1.2 billion people worldwide in deltaic regions characterized by soft top soil. Economic activity in these areas requires lowering groundwater levels to keep the land sufficiently dry, which leaves future generations worse off by accelerating subsidence and increasing future costs. This paper provides a model that recognizes this trade‐off and yields analytical expressions for the groundwater level paths that optimally manage the dynamics of subsidence in agricultural lands. Applying our model to the paradigm case of Dutch peatlands, we find that accounting for dynamic efficiency increases welfare by more than 2.5% compared to a myopic benchmark, and these gains can be about 10% within reasonable parameter ranges. Our results support current proposals to reduce subsidence, even without considering additional social benefits from avoided carbon dioxide emissions.

American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.