Financing technological innovation in China: neo-developmental financial statecraft through government guidance funds

This paper examines China’s distinctive approach to financing innovation, contributing to debates on the derisking state, neo-developmentalist alternatives, and economic statecraft. It focuses on the central role of government guidance funds (GGFs)—jointly owned by a wide range of state entities—and their divergence from government-owned venture capital models in the European derisking state and liberal-developmental states like South Korea. By advancing a financial statecraft perspective, the paper identifies four core features that set Chinese GGFs apart: clearly defined sectoral innovation targets; the conversion of fiscal resources and SOE assets into risk capital; and the coordination in funding the objectives of government planning apparatuses and their geographically conditioned investment mandates. These features reflect both structural aspects of China’s political economy and the rapid institutional evolution of its innovation-oriented bureaucracy. The shadow cases from Europe and South Korea underscore the importance of studying the nexus between national varieties of financial statecraft and national policy regimes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of International Political Economy
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2025.2546858
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Private Equity and Venture Capital
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Financing technological innovation in China: neo-developmental financial statecraft through government guidance funds

Xuan Li, Cornel Ban
2 citations
Review of International Political Economy
Private Equity and Venture Capital
7.82
article

Financing technological innovation in China: neo-developmental financial statecraft through government guidance funds

Xuan Li, Cornel Ban
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper examines China’s distinctive approach to financing innovation, contributing to debates on the derisking state, neo-developmentalist alternatives, and economic statecraft. It focuses on the central role of government guidance funds (GGFs)—jointly owned by a wide range of state entities—and their divergence from government-owned venture capital models in the European derisking state and liberal-developmental states like South Korea. By advancing a financial statecraft perspective, the paper identifies four core features that set Chinese GGFs apart: clearly defined sectoral innovation targets; the conversion of fiscal resources and SOE assets into risk capital; and the coordination in funding the objectives of government planning apparatuses and their geographically conditioned investment mandates. These features reflect both structural aspects of China’s political economy and the rapid institutional evolution of its innovation-oriented bureaucracy. The shadow cases from Europe and South Korea underscore the importance of studying the nexus between national varieties of financial statecraft and national policy regimes.

Review of International Political EconomyVol. 33(1)
Zhejiang International Studies University (CN), Center for Global Development (US), Copenhagen Business School (DK), Zhejiang University of Technology (CN)
Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Private Equity and Venture Capital
7.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Financing technological innovation in China: neo-developmental financial statecraft through government guidance funds — Xuan Li, Cornel Ban · Review of International Political Economy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS