Effectiveness of innovator dydrogesterone versus generic dydrogesterone in early pregnancy: a real-world analysis

Background: Miscarriage is the most common complication of early pregnancy. Dydrogesterone, a retro-steroid with high oral bioavailability and receptor selectivity, is widely prescribed to support and maintain pregnancy via its novel immunomodulation mechanism. There is a lack of comparative data on the miscarriage rate for pregnant females prescribed innovator, generic, and no dydrogesterone in early pregnancy. This study aimed to evaluate this comparative rate in real-world settings. Methods: A real-world, retrospective, observational study was conducted using anonymized and aggregated medical records from January 2017 to October 2024. Early pregnancy females (18-45 years) who consulted gynecologists were included. These were categorized into three arms: innovator dydrogesterone (Arm 1), generic dydrogesterone (Arm 2), and no dydrogesterone (Arm 3). These arms were balanced by propensity score matching (PSM), and miscarriage rates were compared using the Chi-square test. Results: The incidence of miscarriage was significantly lower in the innovator arm (4.10%) compared to Arm 2 (5.54%, p=0.040) and arm 3 (12.46%, p<0.001). No event of miscarriage was reported among women who switched from generic to innovator dydrogesterone. However, one of the females who shifted from innovator to generic experienced a loss of pregnancy. Conclusions: Innovator dydrogesterone was associated with the lowest rate of miscarriage compared to generic and no dydrogesterone. This suggests its potential clinical benefits in early pregnancy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20252717
Primary Topic
Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of innovator dydrogesterone versus generic dydrogesterone in early pregnancy: a real-world analysis

Manu Sharma, Snehal Shah, Garima Verma, Vaibhav Miglani et al.
1 links
International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
article

Effectiveness of innovator dydrogesterone versus generic dydrogesterone in early pregnancy: a real-world analysis

Manu Sharma, Snehal Shah, Garima Verma, Vaibhav Miglani, Sunita Jamwal, Supriya Kaloo, Sandeep Gudibanda, Jayanthy Govindaraj
article en

Abstract

Background: Miscarriage is the most common complication of early pregnancy. Dydrogesterone, a retro-steroid with high oral bioavailability and receptor selectivity, is widely prescribed to support and maintain pregnancy via its novel immunomodulation mechanism. There is a lack of comparative data on the miscarriage rate for pregnant females prescribed innovator, generic, and no dydrogesterone in early pregnancy. This study aimed to evaluate this comparative rate in real-world settings. Methods: A real-world, retrospective, observational study was conducted using anonymized and aggregated medical records from January 2017 to October 2024. Early pregnancy females (18-45 years) who consulted gynecologists were included. These were categorized into three arms: innovator dydrogesterone (Arm 1), generic dydrogesterone (Arm 2), and no dydrogesterone (Arm 3). These arms were balanced by propensity score matching (PSM), and miscarriage rates were compared using the Chi-square test. Results: The incidence of miscarriage was significantly lower in the innovator arm (4.10%) compared to Arm 2 (5.54%, p=0.040) and arm 3 (12.46%, p<0.001). No event of miscarriage was reported among women who switched from generic to innovator dydrogesterone. However, one of the females who shifted from innovator to generic experienced a loss of pregnancy. Conclusions: Innovator dydrogesterone was associated with the lowest rate of miscarriage compared to generic and no dydrogesterone. This suggests its potential clinical benefits in early pregnancy.

International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 14(9)
University of Jammu (IN), OmniActive Health Technologies (India) (IN)
International Council for Canadian Studies
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.