Between Two Histories: Jahanara Begum in the Works of Ira Mukhoty and B. P. Saksena

This paper investigates how Mughal princess Jahanara Begum is portrayed in two contrasting historical narratives: Banarsi Prasad Saksena’s History of Shahjahan of Dihli and Ira Mukhoty’s Daughters of the Sun. The study explores how differing historiographical approaches, specifically traditional and feminist frameworks, influence the representation of Jahanara’s agency, status, and contributions. It adopts a qualitative, comparative textual analysis informed by feminist historiography, drawing upon the frameworks of Gerda Lerner and Joan W. Scott to examine how patriarchal structures and gendered assumptions shape historical writing. Particular attention is given to how each author presents Jahanara’s political, economic, spiritual, and cultural roles within the Mughal court. The analysis reveals that Saksena’s account marginalizes Jahanara, portraying her primarily within domestic and familial confines while largely overlooking her influence in public affairs. In contrast, Mukhoty reinterprets Jahanara as a multifaceted historical figure, including her roles as a political advisor, Sufi intellectual, economic entrepreneur, and patron of architecture and learning. This interpretation is based on a wide range of textual, visual, and material sources. By foregrounding Jahanara’s lived experience, Mukhoty challenges male-dominated historiographical conventions and restores the complexity of elite women’s roles in Mughal India. This study offers a theory-driven comparison that brings together conventional and feminist historiography to reevaluate a pivotal woman in South Asian history. It underscores the importance of feminist historical approaches in recovering women’s voices, addressing historical silences, and reframing dominant narratives. The research ultimately contributes to more inclusive and gender-conscious approaches to writing Mughal history and highlights the value of methodological diversity in historical scholarship. Paper type: Research paper.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Philosophy and Languages (IJPL)
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47992/ijpl.2583.9934.0046
Primary Topic
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between Two Histories: Jahanara Begum in the Works of Ira Mukhoty and B. P. Saksena

Anbarasu Lourdusamy, Prajwala S. Sanil
International Journal of Philosophy and Languages (IJPL)
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
article

Between Two Histories: Jahanara Begum in the Works of Ira Mukhoty and B. P. Saksena

Anbarasu Lourdusamy, Prajwala S. Sanil
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates how Mughal princess Jahanara Begum is portrayed in two contrasting historical narratives: Banarsi Prasad Saksena’s History of Shahjahan of Dihli and Ira Mukhoty’s Daughters of the Sun. The study explores how differing historiographical approaches, specifically traditional and feminist frameworks, influence the representation of Jahanara’s agency, status, and contributions. It adopts a qualitative, comparative textual analysis informed by feminist historiography, drawing upon the frameworks of Gerda Lerner and Joan W. Scott to examine how patriarchal structures and gendered assumptions shape historical writing. Particular attention is given to how each author presents Jahanara’s political, economic, spiritual, and cultural roles within the Mughal court. The analysis reveals that Saksena’s account marginalizes Jahanara, portraying her primarily within domestic and familial confines while largely overlooking her influence in public affairs. In contrast, Mukhoty reinterprets Jahanara as a multifaceted historical figure, including her roles as a political advisor, Sufi intellectual, economic entrepreneur, and patron of architecture and learning. This interpretation is based on a wide range of textual, visual, and material sources. By foregrounding Jahanara’s lived experience, Mukhoty challenges male-dominated historiographical conventions and restores the complexity of elite women’s roles in Mughal India. This study offers a theory-driven comparison that brings together conventional and feminist historiography to reevaluate a pivotal woman in South Asian history. It underscores the importance of feminist historical approaches in recovering women’s voices, addressing historical silences, and reframing dominant narratives. The research ultimately contributes to more inclusive and gender-conscious approaches to writing Mughal history and highlights the value of methodological diversity in historical scholarship. Paper type: Research paper.

International Journal of Philosophy and Languages (IJPL)
Mangalore University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Between Two Histories: Jahanara Begum in the Works of Ira Mukhoty and B. P. Saksena — Anbarasu Lourdusamy, Prajwala S. Sanil · International Journal of Philosophy and Languages (IJPL) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS