Photographic Ridge Width Measurement After 2 Different Alveolar Ridge-Preservation Procedures: Clinical Study Analysis Part III

This study aimed to photographically compare the ridge width at baseline, immediately postsurgery and at 4 weeks and 8 weeks thereafter after using 2 different ridge-preservation procedures. Part I of this clinical study randomly allocated a total of 26 extraction sites from 17 patients to either study group using a computer-generated randomization assignment software. Only 16 sites were qualified for this final analysis. Group I received a cortico-cancellous allograft bone chip (CCBC) mix and a dense polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) barrier membrane, and group II received a type I bovine Achilles tendon collagen plug with bioactive resorbable calcium apatite crystals (CPCAC). Adobe Photoshop CS3 was used to measure the ridge width at the extraction site at 4 distinct time points: baseline (T0), immediately postoperatively (PO) (T1), 4 weeks PO (T2), and 8 weeks PO (T3). The experimental design was a typical repeated-measures design. Statistical significance was evaluated at p < .0042 to adjust for multiple comparisons. No statistically significant differences were found between groups I and II at any assessment regardless of whether the assessment was expressed as an absolute measurement in millimeters or as a percentage of change from baseline assessed before surgery. However, the percentage of ridge width reduction significantly increased over time within each group when comparing each pair of time points except for the T0-T1 (p < .0001) and T2-T3 (p < .0001) comparisons. The sockets that received CPCAC showed similar ridge width reduction when compared with the group that received CCBC with dPTFE at T3. There was no statistically significant difference in ridge width within each group for both T0-T1 and T2-T3 (p > .0042). However, the percentage of width reduction significantly increased over time within each group, when comparing each 2 time points except for the T0-T1 and T2-T3 comparisons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Oral Implantology
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-24-00078
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Photographic Ridge Width Measurement After 2 Different Alveolar Ridge-Preservation Procedures: Clinical Study Analysis Part III

Paul Luepke, Shokoufeh Shahrabi‐Farahani, Nader Nathan Nagavi, Cimara Fortes Blunt
Journal of Oral Implantology
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Photographic Ridge Width Measurement After 2 Different Alveolar Ridge-Preservation Procedures: Clinical Study Analysis Part III

Paul Luepke, Shokoufeh Shahrabi‐Farahani, Nader Nathan Nagavi, Cimara Fortes Blunt
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to photographically compare the ridge width at baseline, immediately postsurgery and at 4 weeks and 8 weeks thereafter after using 2 different ridge-preservation procedures. Part I of this clinical study randomly allocated a total of 26 extraction sites from 17 patients to either study group using a computer-generated randomization assignment software. Only 16 sites were qualified for this final analysis. Group I received a cortico-cancellous allograft bone chip (CCBC) mix and a dense polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) barrier membrane, and group II received a type I bovine Achilles tendon collagen plug with bioactive resorbable calcium apatite crystals (CPCAC). Adobe Photoshop CS3 was used to measure the ridge width at the extraction site at 4 distinct time points: baseline (T0), immediately postoperatively (PO) (T1), 4 weeks PO (T2), and 8 weeks PO (T3). The experimental design was a typical repeated-measures design. Statistical significance was evaluated at p < .0042 to adjust for multiple comparisons. No statistically significant differences were found between groups I and II at any assessment regardless of whether the assessment was expressed as an absolute measurement in millimeters or as a percentage of change from baseline assessed before surgery. However, the percentage of ridge width reduction significantly increased over time within each group when comparing each pair of time points except for the T0-T1 (p < .0001) and T2-T3 (p < .0001) comparisons. The sockets that received CPCAC showed similar ridge width reduction when compared with the group that received CCBC with dPTFE at T3. There was no statistically significant difference in ridge width within each group for both T0-T1 and T2-T3 (p > .0042). However, the percentage of width reduction significantly increased over time within each group, when comparing each 2 time points except for the T0-T1 and T2-T3 comparisons.

Journal of Oral ImplantologyVol. 52(1)
University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US), British Society of Periodontology (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.