Reference values for the five-times-sit-to-stand test: a pooled analysis including 45,470 participants from 14 countries

The aim of this study was to establish reference values for the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST) in a large, population-representative sample from 14 European countries. Data were collected among 45,470 participants aged 50 + years, as part of the 5th wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. The reference values for the FTSST were calculated as the 5th, 10th, 20th, 30th, 40th, 50th, 60th, 70th, 80th, 90th, and the 95th weighted percentile. The analyses were stratified by age and sex. For females, the best performance on the FTSST was observed among the 50-54-year-olds (5th percentile = 18 s; 50th percentile = 10 s; 95th percentile = 6 s) and the worst among 85-89-year-olds and ≥ 90-year-olds (5th percentile = 28 s; 50th percentile = 15 s; 95th percentile = 9 s). For males, the best performance was observed among the 55-59-year-olds (5th percentile = 18 s; 50th percentile = 9 s; 95th percentile = 5 s). The worst performance for males was observed among ≥ 90-year-olds (5th percentile = 26 s; 50th percentile = 15 s; 95th percentile = 9 s), even though the 10th percentile was higher (poorer performance) among 85-89-year-olds. The reference values indicate poorer performance on the test among females and in older age groups. The provided reference values for FTSST can be used for health screening, surveillance, and intervention planning, as they enable an interpretation of test results according to sex and age.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GeroScience
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-025-01863-8
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reference values for the five-times-sit-to-stand test: a pooled analysis including 45,470 participants from 14 countries

Brad J. Schöenfeld, Željko Pedišić, Andrea Britta Maier, Jozo Grgić
3 citations
GeroScience
Physical Activity and Health
3.49
article

Reference values for the five-times-sit-to-stand test: a pooled analysis including 45,470 participants from 14 countries

Brad J. Schöenfeld, Željko Pedišić, Andrea Britta Maier, Jozo Grgić
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish reference values for the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST) in a large, population-representative sample from 14 European countries. Data were collected among 45,470 participants aged 50 + years, as part of the 5th wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. The reference values for the FTSST were calculated as the 5th, 10th, 20th, 30th, 40th, 50th, 60th, 70th, 80th, 90th, and the 95th weighted percentile. The analyses were stratified by age and sex. For females, the best performance on the FTSST was observed among the 50-54-year-olds (5th percentile = 18 s; 50th percentile = 10 s; 95th percentile = 6 s) and the worst among 85-89-year-olds and ≥ 90-year-olds (5th percentile = 28 s; 50th percentile = 15 s; 95th percentile = 9 s). For males, the best performance was observed among the 55-59-year-olds (5th percentile = 18 s; 50th percentile = 9 s; 95th percentile = 5 s). The worst performance for males was observed among ≥ 90-year-olds (5th percentile = 26 s; 50th percentile = 15 s; 95th percentile = 9 s), even though the 10th percentile was higher (poorer performance) among 85-89-year-olds. The reference values indicate poorer performance on the test among females and in older age groups. The provided reference values for FTSST can be used for health screening, surveillance, and intervention planning, as they enable an interpretation of test results according to sex and age.

GeroScienceVol. 48(2)
Lehman College (US), National University of Singapore (SG), HKU-Pasteur Research Pole (HK), National University Health System (SG), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Physical Activity and Health
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.