Testing an adapted obesity prevention intervention in under resourced schools: a pilot clustered randomized controlled trial

The purpose of this pilot study was to test an adapted childhood obesity prevention intervention called Preventing Obesity Using Digital-Assisted Movement and Eating (ProudMe) in under-resourced schools. Six schools were cluster-randomized to ProudMe (n = 33; at three schools) or waitlist control (n = 46; at three schools) conditions. ProudMe aimed to improve participants' health behaviors and weight status through interventions in the school cafeteria (i.e., ProudMe Cafeteria), physical education (PE) (i.e., ProudMe PE), and through artificial-intelligence- (AI-) assisted behavioral counseling (i.e., ProudMe Tech), and staff professional development (i.e., ProudMe PD). Two implementation outcomes including penetration and fidelity were captured through mixed methods. We drew upon the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify facilitators and barriers underlying implementation. The intervention only resulted in highly positive implementation outcomes in the cafeterias, which subsequently resulted in improved cafeteria scores. Implementation outcomes were less desirable in ProudMe PE with moderate penetration and fidelity. ProudMe PD was well attended but ProudMe Tech was under-utilized. The pilot intervention as a whole did not show significant effects on student-level outcomes (p > 0.05). Multiple facilitators and barriers across CFIR domains emerged as influential factors for the pilot intervention's implementation and preliminary effectiveness. This study generated mixed evidence concerning the ProudMe intervention. The lessons learned inform future intervention refinement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16754-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing an adapted obesity prevention intervention in under resourced schools: a pilot clustered randomized controlled trial

Fahui Wang, Richard R. Rosenkranz, Mónica Suárez‐Reyes, Katherine Spring et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
3.76
article

Testing an adapted obesity prevention intervention in under resourced schools: a pilot clustered randomized controlled trial

Fahui Wang, Richard R. Rosenkranz, Mónica Suárez‐Reyes, Katherine Spring, Yu Nie, Renee A. Underwood, Q. Tan, Senlin Chen, Amanda E. Staiano, Jared N. Androzzi, Paul Son
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this pilot study was to test an adapted childhood obesity prevention intervention called Preventing Obesity Using Digital-Assisted Movement and Eating (ProudMe) in under-resourced schools. Six schools were cluster-randomized to ProudMe (n = 33; at three schools) or waitlist control (n = 46; at three schools) conditions. ProudMe aimed to improve participants' health behaviors and weight status through interventions in the school cafeteria (i.e., ProudMe Cafeteria), physical education (PE) (i.e., ProudMe PE), and through artificial-intelligence- (AI-) assisted behavioral counseling (i.e., ProudMe Tech), and staff professional development (i.e., ProudMe PD). Two implementation outcomes including penetration and fidelity were captured through mixed methods. We drew upon the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify facilitators and barriers underlying implementation. The intervention only resulted in highly positive implementation outcomes in the cafeterias, which subsequently resulted in improved cafeteria scores. Implementation outcomes were less desirable in ProudMe PE with moderate penetration and fidelity. ProudMe PD was well attended but ProudMe Tech was under-utilized. The pilot intervention as a whole did not show significant effects on student-level outcomes (p > 0.05). Multiple facilitators and barriers across CFIR domains emerged as influential factors for the pilot intervention's implementation and preliminary effectiveness. This study generated mixed evidence concerning the ProudMe intervention. The lessons learned inform future intervention refinement.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US), Universidad de Santiago de Chile (CL), Louisiana State University (US), University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), Winthrop University (US), Southeastern Louisiana University (US)
Louisiana Board of Regents, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.