Mating status-dependent ‘choice’ in competitive and non-competitive arenas

To maximize their reproductive fitness, females of many polyandrous species should display mating status-dependent choice, where they mate relatively indiscriminately once to ensure reproductive output, and then become choosy and mate preferentially with higher-quality males. Despite this potential contrast in choosiness, most mate choice experiments use virgin females. Here, using a panel of 20 isofemale strains that originated from wild-caught flies, we allowed virgin and non-virgin <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> females to choose among males from the same panel of strains. We used single-male latency trials and a series of male competition trials to help disentangle female "choices" from male-male competitive effects. Most virgin females mated within 2 h of males being introduced, compared with fewer than half of non-virgin females mating over the same period. However, despite mating more rapidly, virgin females did not mate indiscriminately, and their "choices" strongly aligned with those of previously mated females across both the single-male latency and male-male competition trials. Our results challenge the idea that virgin females mate relatively indiscriminately and show that female choice may be more stable than is generally appreciated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Ecology
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/araf080
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mating status-dependent ‘choice’ in competitive and non-competitive arenas

Rowan A. Lymbery, Robert J. Dugand, W. Jason Kennington, Joseph L. Tomkins et al.
Behavioral Ecology
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
article

Mating status-dependent ‘choice’ in competitive and non-competitive arenas

Rowan A. Lymbery, Robert J. Dugand, W. Jason Kennington, Joseph L. Tomkins, N Dewan
article en

Abstract

To maximize their reproductive fitness, females of many polyandrous species should display mating status-dependent choice, where they mate relatively indiscriminately once to ensure reproductive output, and then become choosy and mate preferentially with higher-quality males. Despite this potential contrast in choosiness, most mate choice experiments use virgin females. Here, using a panel of 20 isofemale strains that originated from wild-caught flies, we allowed virgin and non-virgin <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> females to choose among males from the same panel of strains. We used single-male latency trials and a series of male competition trials to help disentangle female "choices" from male-male competitive effects. Most virgin females mated within 2 h of males being introduced, compared with fewer than half of non-virgin females mating over the same period. However, despite mating more rapidly, virgin females did not mate indiscriminately, and their "choices" strongly aligned with those of previously mated females across both the single-male latency and male-male competition trials. Our results challenge the idea that virgin females mate relatively indiscriminately and show that female choice may be more stable than is generally appreciated.

Behavioral EcologyVol. 36(4)
The University of Western Australia (AU), Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (AU)
Directorate for Biological Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mating status-dependent ‘choice’ in competitive and non-competitive arenas — Rowan A. Lymbery, Robert J. Dugand, et al. · Behavioral Ecology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS