Comparative effectiveness of remote perioperative telemonitoring in cancer surgery: a randomized trial

This randomized trial compared remote perioperative telemonitoring (RPM) care versus surgeon only care in patients with gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), or gynecological (GYN) cancers (N = 293). The RPM care arm wore a wristband accelerometer and reported symptoms via a mobile application (app) before surgery and at days 7, 14, 30, 60, 90 post-discharge. Triage nurses telephoned patients when data deviated from predetermined thresholds. Participants in the surgeon only care arm used the device and app but received a standard institutional message when threshold deviations occurred. A 6% greater functional recovery rate was observed for participants in the RPM care arm (p = 0.036). Change in symptom severity scores was statistically significant at day 90 and for symptom interference with daily activities at days 14 and 90, favoring the RPM care arm. The RPM care arm experienced fewer major postoperative complications (p = 0.004). RPM care produced statistically significant benefits in postoperative functional recovery and symptoms. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04596384, 10/22/2020.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01961-z
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative effectiveness of remote perioperative telemonitoring in cancer surgery: a randomized trial

Joycelynne Palmer, Margaret Nolde, Dan J. Raz, Laleh Golkar Melstrom et al.
3 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
6.02
article

Comparative effectiveness of remote perioperative telemonitoring in cancer surgery: a randomized trial

Joycelynne Palmer, Margaret Nolde, Dan J. Raz, Laleh Golkar Melstrom, Thanh H. Dellinger, Calvin P. Tribby, Bertram Yuh, Tracy E. Crane, Betty Ferrell, Virginia Chih-Yi Sun, Yi Xiao, Shanpeng Li, Yuman Fong, Enrique Cota-Robles, Linda Cota-Robles
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This randomized trial compared remote perioperative telemonitoring (RPM) care versus surgeon only care in patients with gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), or gynecological (GYN) cancers (N = 293). The RPM care arm wore a wristband accelerometer and reported symptoms via a mobile application (app) before surgery and at days 7, 14, 30, 60, 90 post-discharge. Triage nurses telephoned patients when data deviated from predetermined thresholds. Participants in the surgeon only care arm used the device and app but received a standard institutional message when threshold deviations occurred. A 6% greater functional recovery rate was observed for participants in the RPM care arm (p = 0.036). Change in symptom severity scores was statistically significant at day 90 and for symptom interference with daily activities at days 14 and 90, favoring the RPM care arm. The RPM care arm experienced fewer major postoperative complications (p = 0.004). RPM care produced statistically significant benefits in postoperative functional recovery and symptoms. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04596384, 10/22/2020.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
University of Miami (US), Partners In Care (US), City of Hope (US), Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), National Patient Safety Foundation (US)
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
6.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.