Sourcing seed for restoration in an era of climate change: conceptual frameworks and available evidence

Rapid climate change has prompted concerns that seed sourced from plant populations near restoration sites will be poorly adapted to future climate conditions and will fail to adapt as conditions change. As a result, some researchers and practitioners advocate for actively translocating non‐local genetic material with the intention of enhancing pre‐adaptation of restored populations to future climate (i.e., “assisted migration”). However, the paucity of direct experimental evidence that such “predictively” sourced seed outperforms seed from locally sourced populations as the climate changes undermines confidence in this approach. In contrast, a large body of research has shown that evolutionary adaptation can be rapid, and recent experiments demonstrate that populations—including highly fragmented ones—retain capacity for ongoing adaptation. Thus, available experimental evidence supports sourcing seeds from populations near restoration sites as a key component of a proactive strategy to establish resilient and well adapted plant populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70187
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sourcing seed for restoration in an era of climate change: conceptual frameworks and available evidence

Anna R. Peschel, Stuart Wagenius, Ruth G. Shaw, Jared J. Beck
2 citations
Restoration Ecology
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
3.43
article

Sourcing seed for restoration in an era of climate change: conceptual frameworks and available evidence

Anna R. Peschel, Stuart Wagenius, Ruth G. Shaw, Jared J. Beck
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Rapid climate change has prompted concerns that seed sourced from plant populations near restoration sites will be poorly adapted to future climate conditions and will fail to adapt as conditions change. As a result, some researchers and practitioners advocate for actively translocating non‐local genetic material with the intention of enhancing pre‐adaptation of restored populations to future climate (i.e., “assisted migration”). However, the paucity of direct experimental evidence that such “predictively” sourced seed outperforms seed from locally sourced populations as the climate changes undermines confidence in this approach. In contrast, a large body of research has shown that evolutionary adaptation can be rapid, and recent experiments demonstrate that populations—including highly fragmented ones—retain capacity for ongoing adaptation. Thus, available experimental evidence supports sourcing seeds from populations near restoration sites as a key component of a proactive strategy to establish resilient and well adapted plant populations.

Restoration EcologyVol. 33(8)
University of Minnesota (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Center for Plant Conservation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sourcing seed for restoration in an era of climate change: conceptual frameworks and available evidence — Anna R. Peschel, Stuart Wagenius, et al. · Restoration Ecology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS