Comparative Investigation of Single‐Crystalline and Polycrystalline NaNi<sub>1/3</sub>Fe<sub>1/3</sub>Mn<sub>1/3</sub>O<sub>2</sub> Positive Materials for Sodium‐Ion Batteries

Layered oxide positive materials (Na<sub>x</sub>TMO<sub>2</sub>) for sodium-ion batteries have received widespread attention due to their advantages of high tap density, high theoretical specific capacity, and easy scale-up preparation. However, the current research about single-crystalline and polycrystalline materials is very limited, and the effect of the single-crystalline and polycrystalline structures on the electrochemical performance is still unclear. Based on this, NaNi<sub>1/3</sub>Fe<sub>1/3</sub>Mn<sub>1/3</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (NFM111) is used as the basic system to systematically investigate in depth the single-crystalline and polycrystalline positive materials. Contrary to the traditional view, the single-crystalline material demonstrates poorer cycling performance due to the multiple phase transitions at high voltage (>4.1 V vs Na<sup>+</sup>/Na), the presence of harmful monoclinic phases dominated by the P3' phase during the first-cycle discharge process, which produces a huge volume change and as resulted large cracks, making the material failure. On the other hand, the gas production is more serious due to the presence of fine primary particles in polycrystalline materials, which makes the cycling performance worse under the large-scale application of pouch batteries. This work provides a new perspective for a comprehensive understanding of the difference between single-crystalline and polycrystalline materials, and provides an important basis for improving the electrochemical performance of both materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202507393
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advancements in Battery Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Investigation of Single‐Crystalline and Polycrystalline NaNi1/3Fe1/3Mn1/3O2 Positive Materials for Sodium‐Ion Batteries

Jinze Guo, Xin Xiao, Yong Li, Yinzhu Jiang et al.
1 citations
Small
Advancements in Battery Materials
0.73
article

Comparative Investigation of Single‐Crystalline and Polycrystalline NaNi1/3Fe1/3Mn1/3O2 Positive Materials for Sodium‐Ion Batteries

Jinze Guo, Xin Xiao, Yong Li, Yinzhu Jiang, Yao Liu, Weiwei Zha, Zhongcai Zhang, Xiaochong Zhou, Qihao Sun, Ziqi Tian, Yiming Huang, Qinghua Hu, Wenbin Ni, Shunmian Qi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Layered oxide positive materials (Na<sub>x</sub>TMO<sub>2</sub>) for sodium-ion batteries have received widespread attention due to their advantages of high tap density, high theoretical specific capacity, and easy scale-up preparation. However, the current research about single-crystalline and polycrystalline materials is very limited, and the effect of the single-crystalline and polycrystalline structures on the electrochemical performance is still unclear. Based on this, NaNi<sub>1/3</sub>Fe<sub>1/3</sub>Mn<sub>1/3</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (NFM111) is used as the basic system to systematically investigate in depth the single-crystalline and polycrystalline positive materials. Contrary to the traditional view, the single-crystalline material demonstrates poorer cycling performance due to the multiple phase transitions at high voltage (>4.1 V vs Na<sup>+</sup>/Na), the presence of harmful monoclinic phases dominated by the P3' phase during the first-cycle discharge process, which produces a huge volume change and as resulted large cracks, making the material failure. On the other hand, the gas production is more serious due to the presence of fine primary particles in polycrystalline materials, which makes the cycling performance worse under the large-scale application of pouch batteries. This work provides a new perspective for a comprehensive understanding of the difference between single-crystalline and polycrystalline materials, and provides an important basis for improving the electrochemical performance of both materials.

SmallVol. 21(41)
Nanchang University (CN), Huzhou Normal University (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Major Discipline Academic and Technical Leaders Training Program of Jiangxi Province, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Advancements in Battery Materials
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.