Surface Deformation Monitoring and Prediction of InSAR-Hybrid Deep Learning Model for Subsidence Funnels

Mining subsidence is a pervasive geohazard in coal basins, and precise and reliable deformation monitoring is essential to effective risk mitigation. Conventional time-series Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) suffers from vegetation-induced decorrelation and atmospheric delays. Most predictive models leverage only temporal information. We introduced an integrated DS InSAR + CNN LSTM framework for subsidence monitoring and forecasting. Forty-three Sentinel-1A scenes (2017–2018), corrected with Generic Atmospheric Correction Online Service for InSAR (GACOS) data, were processed to derive cumulative deformation, cross-validated against multi-view SBAS InSAR, and used to train a CNN LSTM network that predicts trends one year in advance. The findings indicate that (1) DS InSAR provides 2.83 times the monitoring density of SBAS InSAR, with deformation rate R2 = 0.83, RMSE = 0.0028 m/a, and MAE = 0.0019 m/a at common pixels. The RMS average decrease in GACOS atmospheric delay phase correction is 2.52 mm. (2) High- and low-settlement zones comprise 0.11% and 92.32% of the area, respectively; maximum velocity reaches 190.61 mm/a, with a cumulative subsidence of −338.33 mm. (3) Across the five zones with the most severe subsidence, the CNN–LSTM model attains R2 values of 0.97–0.99 and RMSE below 1 mm, markedly outperforming the standalone LSTM network. (4) Deformation correlated strongly with geological structures, groundwater decline (R2 = 0.66–0.78), and precipitation (slope > 0.33), highlighting coupled natural and anthropogenic control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17172972
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surface Deformation Monitoring and Prediction of InSAR-Hybrid Deep Learning Model for Subsidence Funnels

Ruiping Li, Quanming Liu, Junzhi Wang, Yanxin Wang et al.
2 citations
Remote Sensing
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
9.99
article

Surface Deformation Monitoring and Prediction of InSAR-Hybrid Deep Learning Model for Subsidence Funnels

Ruiping Li, Quanming Liu, Junzhi Wang, Yanxin Wang, Liying Zhou, Fuqiang Wang, Sinan Wang, Xiao‐Ming Ma, Huiqiang Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Mining subsidence is a pervasive geohazard in coal basins, and precise and reliable deformation monitoring is essential to effective risk mitigation. Conventional time-series Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) suffers from vegetation-induced decorrelation and atmospheric delays. Most predictive models leverage only temporal information. We introduced an integrated DS InSAR + CNN LSTM framework for subsidence monitoring and forecasting. Forty-three Sentinel-1A scenes (2017–2018), corrected with Generic Atmospheric Correction Online Service for InSAR (GACOS) data, were processed to derive cumulative deformation, cross-validated against multi-view SBAS InSAR, and used to train a CNN LSTM network that predicts trends one year in advance. The findings indicate that (1) DS InSAR provides 2.83 times the monitoring density of SBAS InSAR, with deformation rate R2 = 0.83, RMSE = 0.0028 m/a, and MAE = 0.0019 m/a at common pixels. The RMS average decrease in GACOS atmospheric delay phase correction is 2.52 mm. (2) High- and low-settlement zones comprise 0.11% and 92.32% of the area, respectively; maximum velocity reaches 190.61 mm/a, with a cumulative subsidence of −338.33 mm. (3) Across the five zones with the most severe subsidence, the CNN–LSTM model attains R2 values of 0.97–0.99 and RMSE below 1 mm, markedly outperforming the standalone LSTM network. (4) Deformation correlated strongly with geological structures, groundwater decline (R2 = 0.66–0.78), and precipitation (slope > 0.33), highlighting coupled natural and anthropogenic control.

Remote SensingVol. 17(17)
Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (CN), China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (CN), Inner Mongolia Electric Power Survey & Design Institute (China) (CN), National Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation of China (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
9.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.