Computational Analysis of Minimum Ignition Energy of Hydrogen–Air Mixtures: Influence of Chemical Reaction Mechanisms

In this study, computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed to quantitatively evaluate the minimum ignition energy of premixed hydrogen–air mixtures using two detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms: GRI-Mech 3.0 and San Diego Mechanism. By systematically varying the ignition energy, the San Diego Mechanism predicted an MIE of 19.6 <i>μ</i>J, with only a 4.1% deviation from the reference value, whereas GRI-Mech 3.0 predicted 28.6 <i>μ</i>J, corresponding to a 49.8% error. These discrepancies are attributed to differences in the reaction pathways and rate constants defined in the two mechanisms. Notably, the San Diego Mechanism exhibited consistently higher rate constants for key chain-branching reactions, facilitating enhanced radical accumulation and more favorable conditions for ignition initiation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Fire Science and Engineering
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7731/kifse.2d038b12
Primary Topic
Combustion and Detonation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computational Analysis of Minimum Ignition Energy of Hydrogen–Air Mixtures: Influence of Chemical Reaction Mechanisms

Seul‐Hyun Park, Dong‐Ju Kim
5 links
Fire Science and Engineering
Combustion and Detonation Processes
article

Computational Analysis of Minimum Ignition Energy of Hydrogen–Air Mixtures: Influence of Chemical Reaction Mechanisms

Seul‐Hyun Park, Dong‐Ju Kim
article en

Abstract

In this study, computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed to quantitatively evaluate the minimum ignition energy of premixed hydrogen–air mixtures using two detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms: GRI-Mech 3.0 and San Diego Mechanism. By systematically varying the ignition energy, the San Diego Mechanism predicted an MIE of 19.6 <i>μ</i>J, with only a 4.1% deviation from the reference value, whereas GRI-Mech 3.0 predicted 28.6 <i>μ</i>J, corresponding to a 49.8% error. These discrepancies are attributed to differences in the reaction pathways and rate constants defined in the two mechanisms. Notably, the San Diego Mechanism exhibited consistently higher rate constants for key chain-branching reactions, facilitating enhanced radical accumulation and more favorable conditions for ignition initiation.

Fire Science and EngineeringVol. 39(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Combustion and Detonation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Computational Analysis of Minimum Ignition Energy of Hydrogen–Air Mixtures: Influence of Chemical Reaction Mechanisms — Seul‐Hyun Park, Dong‐Ju Kim · Fire Science and Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS