Bausmių taikymo praktika ir kalinių populiacijos rodikliai Vokietijoje ir Lietuvoje Europos lyginamojoje perspektyvoje

The incarceration rate of a country is indicative of the nature of its penal policy and the degree of repression it entails. Even in European countries, there is considerable variation. Furthermore, there are disparate trends in its evolution, which elicit disparate responses from different countries. In some countries, low prison populations are regarded as a significant indicator of a moderate and rational penal policy. As they begin to rise, efforts are made to identify strategies for reducing them. Conversely, in other countries, they are accorded less attention until overcrowding becomes a problem. Criminological research indicates that imprisonment is an ineffective and detrimental practice and should only be employed as a last resort with the objective of facilitating resocialisation. The number of individuals incarcerated on an annual basis in a specific country is primarily contingent upon political decisions. A comparison of prison populations and penal policy measures in different countries provides a more nuanced understanding of the effectiveness of the measures taken and allows for a more informed assessment of the need for, and potential for, reform in one’s own country in the context of another. This paper analyses punishment practices and trends in prison populations in Germany and Lithuania in comparison to other European countries. Despite political change and various social and economic developments, Germany has been characterised by a stable and declining prison population in recent years. This example is pertinent to countries that have invested significant resources into reducing their prison populations, such as Lithuania and other Baltic countries, and has achieved notable success. It is also relevant to countries where the prison population has shown a marked increase in recent years. The paper aims to explain the reasons for declining prison populations in Germany and Lithuania and to identify effective strategies and measures that can be implemented to ensure a consistent and sustained reduction in the prison population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kriminologijos studijos
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15388/crimlithuan.2024.12.2
Primary Topic
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bausmių taikymo praktika ir kalinių populiacijos rodikliai Vokietijoje ir Lietuvoje Europos lyginamojoje perspektyvoje

Frieder Dünkel, Gintautas Sakalauskas, Wolfgang Heinz
Kriminologijos studijos
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
article

Bausmių taikymo praktika ir kalinių populiacijos rodikliai Vokietijoje ir Lietuvoje Europos lyginamojoje perspektyvoje

Frieder Dünkel, Gintautas Sakalauskas, Wolfgang Heinz
article en

Abstract

The incarceration rate of a country is indicative of the nature of its penal policy and the degree of repression it entails. Even in European countries, there is considerable variation. Furthermore, there are disparate trends in its evolution, which elicit disparate responses from different countries. In some countries, low prison populations are regarded as a significant indicator of a moderate and rational penal policy. As they begin to rise, efforts are made to identify strategies for reducing them. Conversely, in other countries, they are accorded less attention until overcrowding becomes a problem. Criminological research indicates that imprisonment is an ineffective and detrimental practice and should only be employed as a last resort with the objective of facilitating resocialisation. The number of individuals incarcerated on an annual basis in a specific country is primarily contingent upon political decisions. A comparison of prison populations and penal policy measures in different countries provides a more nuanced understanding of the effectiveness of the measures taken and allows for a more informed assessment of the need for, and potential for, reform in one’s own country in the context of another. This paper analyses punishment practices and trends in prison populations in Germany and Lithuania in comparison to other European countries. Despite political change and various social and economic developments, Germany has been characterised by a stable and declining prison population in recent years. This example is pertinent to countries that have invested significant resources into reducing their prison populations, such as Lithuania and other Baltic countries, and has achieved notable success. It is also relevant to countries where the prison population has shown a marked increase in recent years. The paper aims to explain the reasons for declining prison populations in Germany and Lithuania and to identify effective strategies and measures that can be implemented to ensure a consistent and sustained reduction in the prison population.

Kriminologijos studijosVol. 12
Vilnius University (LT), University of Konstanz (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.