Does Intraoral Scanning at the Subgingival Finish Line Affect the Accuracy of Interim Crowns?

This in vitro study evaluated the internal surface trueness and the marginal and internal fit of interim crowns fabricated from intraoral scanner (IOS; i500, MEDIT, Seoul, Republic of Korea) data, considering variations in subgingival finish line depth and the use of gingival retraction. A right maxillary first molar was prepared using a milled ceramic abutment, with subgingival finish line depths set at 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 mm from the gingival crest. All specimens were scanned with an IOS, both with and without gingival retraction. Interim crowns were designed from the scan data and produced via three-dimensional (3D) printing. Internal surface trueness was measured using 3D inspection software (Geomagic Control X version 2022.0.0; 3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA), while marginal and internal fit were assessed with the silicone replica technique. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis H test (α = 0.05). In the absence of gingival retraction, internal surface trueness and crown fit decreased significantly with increasing finish line depth (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At a 1.00 mm depth without retraction, internal trueness reached 100.1 ± 44.5 µm and marginal fit was 189.1 ± 42.2 µm, both exceeding clinical thresholds. With gingival retraction, trueness and fit remained stable across all depths (<i>p</i> > 0.05). At 1.0 mm depth, trueness was 82.0 ± 61.8 µm and marginal fit was 95.2 ± 22.9 µm, both within clinically acceptable limits. A significant correlation was observed between marginal trueness and overall fit when retraction was not performed (<i>p</i> < 0.05). These results demonstrate that increasing subgingival finish line depth can significantly reduce intraoral scanning accuracy, resulting in suboptimal interim crown adaptation when gingival retraction is omitted. To achieve clinically acceptable internal trueness and marginal fit, gingival displacement with a retraction cord is recommended during intraoral scanning for subgingival prosthesis fabrication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16090309
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Intraoral Scanning at the Subgingival Finish Line Affect the Accuracy of Interim Crowns?

Kyu‐Bok Lee, Keunbada Son, Young‐Tak Son, Ji-Min Lee
1 citations
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
article

Does Intraoral Scanning at the Subgingival Finish Line Affect the Accuracy of Interim Crowns?

Kyu‐Bok Lee, Keunbada Son, Young‐Tak Son, Ji-Min Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This in vitro study evaluated the internal surface trueness and the marginal and internal fit of interim crowns fabricated from intraoral scanner (IOS; i500, MEDIT, Seoul, Republic of Korea) data, considering variations in subgingival finish line depth and the use of gingival retraction. A right maxillary first molar was prepared using a milled ceramic abutment, with subgingival finish line depths set at 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 mm from the gingival crest. All specimens were scanned with an IOS, both with and without gingival retraction. Interim crowns were designed from the scan data and produced via three-dimensional (3D) printing. Internal surface trueness was measured using 3D inspection software (Geomagic Control X version 2022.0.0; 3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA), while marginal and internal fit were assessed with the silicone replica technique. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis H test (α = 0.05). In the absence of gingival retraction, internal surface trueness and crown fit decreased significantly with increasing finish line depth (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At a 1.00 mm depth without retraction, internal trueness reached 100.1 ± 44.5 µm and marginal fit was 189.1 ± 42.2 µm, both exceeding clinical thresholds. With gingival retraction, trueness and fit remained stable across all depths (<i>p</i> > 0.05). At 1.0 mm depth, trueness was 82.0 ± 61.8 µm and marginal fit was 95.2 ± 22.9 µm, both within clinically acceptable limits. A significant correlation was observed between marginal trueness and overall fit when retraction was not performed (<i>p</i> < 0.05). These results demonstrate that increasing subgingival finish line depth can significantly reduce intraoral scanning accuracy, resulting in suboptimal interim crown adaptation when gingival retraction is omitted. To achieve clinically acceptable internal trueness and marginal fit, gingival displacement with a retraction cord is recommended during intraoral scanning for subgingival prosthesis fabrication.

Journal of Functional BiomaterialsVol. 16(9)
Kyungpook National University (KR)
National Research Foundation, Kyungpook National University, Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea, Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.