Beyond Political Lines: How Reproductive Health Attitudes Drive Caregivers’ HPV Vaccine Decisions

Abstract Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine hesitancy remains a critical public health issue, with political identity and reproductive health beliefs potentially influencing caregivers’ decisions. This study investigated the interplay between birth control attitudes, political identity, and HPV vaccine hesitancy among caregivers of children aged 9–17 years. A cross-sectional survey was administered to 2,086 participants across the Northeastern and Southeastern/Mid-Atlantic United States. The sample was weighted to reflect demographic distributions. Political identity (Conservative, Moderate, Liberal), birth control attitudes, and HPV vaccine hesitancy were assessed. Multiple regression analyses examined the main effects and interactions.Over half of the sample showed HPV vaccine hesitancy. Positive birth control attitudes strongly predicted lower HPV vaccine hesitancy in all. Although political identity contributed additional variance, its effect was more pronounced in the Northeast than in the Southeast/Mid-Atlantic. Moderates and Liberals generally reported lower hesitancy than Conservatives. These findings highlight the importance of reproductive health attitudes in shaping HPV vaccination decisions. While political identity also matters, it is overshadowed by the stronger predictive role of birth control attitudes. Interventions aiming to reduce HPV vaccine hesitancy may benefit from integrating broader reproductive health education and carefully navigating political influences to foster more positive vaccine views.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexuality & Culture
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-025-10433-1
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Political Lines: How Reproductive Health Attitudes Drive Caregivers’ HPV Vaccine Decisions

Carmen Rosa Presti, Aisha King, Spring Chenoa Cooper, Beck Graefe et al.
Sexuality & Culture
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Beyond Political Lines: How Reproductive Health Attitudes Drive Caregivers’ HPV Vaccine Decisions

Carmen Rosa Presti, Aisha King, Spring Chenoa Cooper, Beck Graefe, Avi Mikhaylov, Andrew Porter, IG Williams
article en

Abstract

Abstract Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine hesitancy remains a critical public health issue, with political identity and reproductive health beliefs potentially influencing caregivers’ decisions. This study investigated the interplay between birth control attitudes, political identity, and HPV vaccine hesitancy among caregivers of children aged 9–17 years. A cross-sectional survey was administered to 2,086 participants across the Northeastern and Southeastern/Mid-Atlantic United States. The sample was weighted to reflect demographic distributions. Political identity (Conservative, Moderate, Liberal), birth control attitudes, and HPV vaccine hesitancy were assessed. Multiple regression analyses examined the main effects and interactions.Over half of the sample showed HPV vaccine hesitancy. Positive birth control attitudes strongly predicted lower HPV vaccine hesitancy in all. Although political identity contributed additional variance, its effect was more pronounced in the Northeast than in the Southeast/Mid-Atlantic. Moderates and Liberals generally reported lower hesitancy than Conservatives. These findings highlight the importance of reproductive health attitudes in shaping HPV vaccination decisions. While political identity also matters, it is overshadowed by the stronger predictive role of birth control attitudes. Interventions aiming to reduce HPV vaccine hesitancy may benefit from integrating broader reproductive health education and carefully navigating political influences to foster more positive vaccine views.

Sexuality & CultureVol. 30(1)
The Graduate Center, CUNY (US), University of Miami (US), City University of New York (US), CUNY School of Law (US), Hunter College (US)
Merck
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.