Performance of an optical TPC Geant4 simulation with opticks GPU-accelerated photon propagation

Abstract We investigate the performance of , a 7.5 GPU-accelerated photon propagation tool compared with a single-threaded simulation. We compare the simulations using an improved model of the gaseous time projection chamber. Performance results suggest that improves simulation speeds by between $$58.47\pm {0.02}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>58.47</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.02</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and $$181.39\pm {0.28}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>181.39</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.28</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> times relative to a CPU-only simulation and these results vary between different types of GPU and CPU. A detailed comparison shows that the number of detected photons, along with their times and wavelengths, are in good agreement between and .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Physical Journal C
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14612-0
Primary Topic
Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of an optical TPC Geant4 simulation with opticks GPU-accelerated photon propagation

A. P. Marques, C. Hervés Carrete, C. Romo-Luque, Zoraida Freixa et al.
The European Physical Journal C
Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
article

Performance of an optical TPC Geant4 simulation with opticks GPU-accelerated photon propagation

A. P. Marques, C. Hervés Carrete, C. Romo-Luque, Zoraida Freixa, Frank W. Foss, T. Contreras, C.A.N. Conde, F. Kellerer, Y. Ifergan, A. Bayo, Fernando Auria‐Luna, P. Ferrario, Eva Oblak, D. R. Nygren, F.I.G.M. Borges, V. Herrero, Claire Tonnelé, Francisco J. Samaniego, J. Martín-Albo, J. Torrent, S. Torelli, C. Rogero, Fernando P. Cossío, M. Sorel, E. Dey, P. A. O. C. Silva, Francisco Ballester-Merelo, K. Stogsdill, B. J. P. Jones, J. Renner, L. Larizgoitia, J. F. Toledo, M. Martínez-Vara, K. Mistry, J. Baeza-Rubio, A. I. Aranburu, S. Cárcel, Itay Shomroni, Ariadna Pazos, F. Monrabal, R. Guénette, L. Arazi, R. Madigan, Alexander Trettin, F. López Gejo, J. Molina-Canteras, J.J. Gómez-Cadenas, B. Palmeiro, A. Larumbe, I. J. Arnquist, J. W. R. Grocott, I. Parmaksiz, I. A. Moya, J.F.C.A. Veloso, C.D.R. Azevedo, M. Querol, P. Novella, R. Miller, K. E. Navarro, G. Díaz, E. Church, G. Martínez-Lema, P. Herrero-Gómez, S. Ayet, M. Pérez Maneiro, B. Romeo, L. Rogers, J. Soto-Oton, R. Felkai, N. Byrnes, R. D. P. Mano, P. Oyedele, A. L. Ferreira, J. Escada, A. Para, B. Aparicio, J.M.F. dos Santos, C. Adams, J. Pelegrìn, J. Waiton, C. M. B. Monteiro, C. A. O. Henriques, J. M. R. Teixeira, L. M. P. Fernandes, R. Esteve, S. Teruel-Pardo, Laura Cid-Barrio, J. M. Hauptman, V. Álvarez, M. Elorza, F. P. Santos, I. Rivilla, J. Palacio, H. Almazán, Carlos Echevarria, A. Castillo, M. del Barrio-Torregrosa, A. Brodolin, A. Yubero-Navarro, J. García-Barrena, J. A. Hernando Morata, P. Lebrun, S. R. Soleti, J. Asaadi, F. J. Mora, A. Simón, A. Nuñez, P. R. G. Valle, J. M. Benlloch-Rodríguez, K. Bailey, A. Usón, M. Seemann, N. López-March, R. Coupe, V. San Nacienciano
article en

Abstract

Abstract We investigate the performance of , a 7.5 GPU-accelerated photon propagation tool compared with a single-threaded simulation. We compare the simulations using an improved model of the gaseous time projection chamber. Performance results suggest that improves simulation speeds by between $$58.47\pm {0.02}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>58.47</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.02</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and $$181.39\pm {0.28}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>181.39</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.28</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> times relative to a CPU-only simulation and these results vary between different types of GPU and CPU. A detailed comparison shows that the number of detected photons, along with their times and wavelengths, are in good agreement between and .

The European Physical Journal CVol. 85(8)
Ikerbasque (ES), Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), Argonne National Laboratory (US), Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (US), Los Alamos National Laboratory (US), Harvard University (US), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), The University of Texas at El Paso (US), University of the Basque Country (ES), Iowa State University (US), The University of Texas at Arlington (US), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Universitat de Girona (ES), Harvard University Press (US), University of Manchester (GB), Yale University (US), Instituto de Física Corpuscular (ES), Canfranc Underground Laboratory (ES), Instituto de Instrumentación para Imagen Molecular (ES), Servicio Gallego de Salud (ES), IMS Nanofabrication (Austria) (AT), Donostia International Physics Center (ES), Weizmann Institute of Science (IL), Case Western Reserve University (US), University of Aveiro (PT), University of Coimbra (PT), Manchester University (US), SPX Corporation (United States) (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, “la Caixa” Foundation, European Commission, Eusko Jaurlaritza, Generalitat Valenciana, Israel Science Foundation, PAZY Foundation, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Division of Chemistry, Argonne National Laboratory, Fermilab
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.