Decoding Soil Constraints in Queensland, Australia: Strategies for Precision Management to Enhance Crop Productivity

ABSTRACT Soil constraints significantly impact crop productivity, yet their direct relationships to yield remain unclear. This limits the development of targeted soil management strategies for improving agricultural output. This study aims to clarify the influence of key soil constraints on crop productivity by examining soil chemical indicators across distinct productivity zones in Queensland. Soil samples were collected from 21 farms across three productivity zones (consistently low, inconsistent, and consistently high) and five soil layers (D1–D5, 0–10, 10–30, 30–60, 60–90, and 90–120 cm). We utilized the Constraint ID tool alongside mixed‐effects models, principal component analysis (PCA), and machine learning to evaluate indicators including nitrate (NO 3 − ), electrical conductivity of the saturated soil extract (ECe), pH, chloride (Cl), exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), and exchangeable cations (Ca, K, and Mg). This integrated approach—among the first in Queensland—enabled depth‐specific and spatially explicit analysis of soil constraint impacts. ECe, pH, Cl, and ESP are critical factors influencing soil fertility, particularly in subsoil layers (D3–D5). Low‐yielding zones (Zone L) exhibited high pH (up to 8.41), Cl (up to 151 mg/kg), ESP (up to 8.64), and ECe (exceeding 4 dS/m), indicating salinity, alkalinity, and sodicity issues. These subsoil constraints are difficult to remediate, highlighting the need for surface‐level strategies that support whole‐profile soil health. This study underscores the necessity of site‐specific, surface‐focused interventions that address constraints across the entire soil profile. The findings offer actionable insights for tailoring soil management and support regional decision‐making to optimize crop yields in Queensland's agricultural systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Degradation and Development
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70111
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding Soil Constraints in Queensland, Australia: Strategies for Precision Management to Enhance Crop Productivity

Lizhen Cui, Caixian Tang, Yash P. Dang, Ram C. Dalal et al.
1 citations
Land Degradation and Development
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.19
article

Decoding Soil Constraints in Queensland, Australia: Strategies for Precision Management to Enhance Crop Productivity

Lizhen Cui, Caixian Tang, Yash P. Dang, Ram C. Dalal, Vilim Filipović, Hongdou Liu, Timothy I. McLaren, Yunru Lai, Tong Li, Ranjay K. Singh, Cong He, Bernhard Wehr
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Soil constraints significantly impact crop productivity, yet their direct relationships to yield remain unclear. This limits the development of targeted soil management strategies for improving agricultural output. This study aims to clarify the influence of key soil constraints on crop productivity by examining soil chemical indicators across distinct productivity zones in Queensland. Soil samples were collected from 21 farms across three productivity zones (consistently low, inconsistent, and consistently high) and five soil layers (D1–D5, 0–10, 10–30, 30–60, 60–90, and 90–120 cm). We utilized the Constraint ID tool alongside mixed‐effects models, principal component analysis (PCA), and machine learning to evaluate indicators including nitrate (NO 3 − ), electrical conductivity of the saturated soil extract (ECe), pH, chloride (Cl), exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), and exchangeable cations (Ca, K, and Mg). This integrated approach—among the first in Queensland—enabled depth‐specific and spatially explicit analysis of soil constraint impacts. ECe, pH, Cl, and ESP are critical factors influencing soil fertility, particularly in subsoil layers (D3–D5). Low‐yielding zones (Zone L) exhibited high pH (up to 8.41), Cl (up to 151 mg/kg), ESP (up to 8.64), and ECe (exceeding 4 dS/m), indicating salinity, alkalinity, and sodicity issues. These subsoil constraints are difficult to remediate, highlighting the need for surface‐level strategies that support whole‐profile soil health. This study underscores the necessity of site‐specific, surface‐focused interventions that address constraints across the entire soil profile. The findings offer actionable insights for tailoring soil management and support regional decision‐making to optimize crop yields in Queensland's agricultural systems.

Land Degradation and DevelopmentVol. 37(1)
Griffith University (AU), Central Soil Salinity Research Institute (IN), The University of Queensland (AU), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (IN), University of Southern Queensland (AU), La Trobe University (AU), Institute of Wetland Research (CN), Chinese Academy of Forestry (CN), Agriculture and Food (AU), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (CN), Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IN), China Agricultural University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.