Az automatizált döntéshozatalról és profilalkotásról az Európai Unióban - a Dun and Bradstreet-ítélet

On 7 December 2023, the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter: the Court) delivered a judgment in the case of SCHUFA Holding and Others (hereinafter: the SCHUFA case). The judgment addressed certain aspects of automated decisionmaking and profiling with respect to the GDPR, with particular regard to the nature and extent of information that needs to be shared with the person affected by the automated decision. The judgment represented a milestone, however, it was not comprehensive. The gap left by this judgment appears to be filled by the Dun & Bradstreet ruling, delivered approximately one and a half years later, which contributes further to framing algorithmic decision-making within a clear legal context.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Magyar Jog
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59851/mj.72.08.9
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Az automatizált döntéshozatalról és profilalkotásról az Európai Unióban - a Dun and Bradstreet-ítélet

Gabriella Tárnok
Magyar Jog
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Az automatizált döntéshozatalról és profilalkotásról az Európai Unióban - a Dun and Bradstreet-ítélet

Gabriella Tárnok
article en

Abstract

On 7 December 2023, the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter: the Court) delivered a judgment in the case of SCHUFA Holding and Others (hereinafter: the SCHUFA case). The judgment addressed certain aspects of automated decisionmaking and profiling with respect to the GDPR, with particular regard to the nature and extent of information that needs to be shared with the person affected by the automated decision. The judgment represented a milestone, however, it was not comprehensive. The gap left by this judgment appears to be filled by the Dun & Bradstreet ruling, delivered approximately one and a half years later, which contributes further to framing algorithmic decision-making within a clear legal context.

Magyar JogVol. 72
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.