The effects of chemical preservation on bulk isotope ratios in Atlantic bluefin tuna and Atlantic bonito muscle tissue

Biological samples collected during oceanographic research are often chemically preserved to maintain tissue integrity prior to analysis. However, chemical preservation can produce changes in isotopic signatures and elemental compositions of the preserved samples. These changes typically adhere to predictable ranges, but effects vary by species. The impacts of two commonly used chemical preservatives, formalin and ethanol, were tested on tissue samples from Atlantic bluefin tuna (<i>Thunnus thynnus</i>) and Atlantic bonito (<i>Sarda sarda</i>). Tissue samples underwent bulk isotope signature and elemental analysis for <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N, <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C, %N, %C, and C:N before chemical preservation and again after 1, 3, and 12 months. Significant increase in <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N occurred after preservation in both formalin and ethanol (12-month preservation: +0.95 ‰ ± 0.2 formalin, +0.83 ‰ ± 0.3 ethanol <i>T. thynnus</i>; +0.9 ‰ ± 0.2 formalin,+0.86 ‰ ± 0.2 ethanol <i>S. sarda</i>). In most cases, a significant decrease in <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C after preservation was observed, but the effect from formalin was most extreme (12-month preservation: -2.93 ‰ ± 0.2 formalin, -0.34 ‰ ± 0.4 ethanol <i>T. thynnus</i>; -2.86 ‰ ±0.2 formalin,-0.33 ‰ ±0.1 ethanol <i>S. sarda</i>). Changes to tissue C:N ratio were significant after preservation in formalin (+0.18 ± 0.1 <i>T. thynnus</i>; + 0.27 ± 0.1 <i>S. sarda</i>), but not after preservation in ethanol. Similarities in changes of each parameter were observed between both Scombrid species. The observed changes in <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N (∼1 ‰) were minor relative to expected differences between trophic levels (3-5 ‰). However, decrease in <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C by formalin (∼3 ‰) may result in misinterpretation of primary producer communities if corrections for preservation effect are not done. Changes in elemental composition (%N, %C, and C:N) were more variable. The mechanisms by which chemical preservatives interact with tissue carbon and nitrogen require further study to explain the relative changes in elemental composition over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10256016.2025.2508818
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effects of chemical preservation on bulk isotope ratios in Atlantic bluefin tuna and Atlantic bonito muscle tissue

Ignacio Baro, Steven X. Cadrin, Alanna Mnich, J.M. Quintanilla-Hervás et al.
1 citations
Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
1.72
article

The effects of chemical preservation on bulk isotope ratios in Atlantic bluefin tuna and Atlantic bonito muscle tissue

Ignacio Baro, Steven X. Cadrin, Alanna Mnich, J.M. Quintanilla-Hervás, Mark A. Altabet, Raúl Láiz-Carrión, Ricardo Borrego‐Santos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Biological samples collected during oceanographic research are often chemically preserved to maintain tissue integrity prior to analysis. However, chemical preservation can produce changes in isotopic signatures and elemental compositions of the preserved samples. These changes typically adhere to predictable ranges, but effects vary by species. The impacts of two commonly used chemical preservatives, formalin and ethanol, were tested on tissue samples from Atlantic bluefin tuna (<i>Thunnus thynnus</i>) and Atlantic bonito (<i>Sarda sarda</i>). Tissue samples underwent bulk isotope signature and elemental analysis for <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N, <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C, %N, %C, and C:N before chemical preservation and again after 1, 3, and 12 months. Significant increase in <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N occurred after preservation in both formalin and ethanol (12-month preservation: +0.95 ‰ ± 0.2 formalin, +0.83 ‰ ± 0.3 ethanol <i>T. thynnus</i>; +0.9 ‰ ± 0.2 formalin,+0.86 ‰ ± 0.2 ethanol <i>S. sarda</i>). In most cases, a significant decrease in <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C after preservation was observed, but the effect from formalin was most extreme (12-month preservation: -2.93 ‰ ± 0.2 formalin, -0.34 ‰ ± 0.4 ethanol <i>T. thynnus</i>; -2.86 ‰ ±0.2 formalin,-0.33 ‰ ±0.1 ethanol <i>S. sarda</i>). Changes to tissue C:N ratio were significant after preservation in formalin (+0.18 ± 0.1 <i>T. thynnus</i>; + 0.27 ± 0.1 <i>S. sarda</i>), but not after preservation in ethanol. Similarities in changes of each parameter were observed between both Scombrid species. The observed changes in <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N (∼1 ‰) were minor relative to expected differences between trophic levels (3-5 ‰). However, decrease in <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C by formalin (∼3 ‰) may result in misinterpretation of primary producer communities if corrections for preservation effect are not done. Changes in elemental composition (%N, %C, and C:N) were more variable. The mechanisms by which chemical preservatives interact with tissue carbon and nitrogen require further study to explain the relative changes in elemental composition over time.

Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (US), Instituto Español de Oceanografía (ES)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.