Resistance to illiberal peacebuilding: towards a new research agenda

In recent years, liberal peacebuilding has been increasingly displaced by illiberal peacebuilding – illiberal norms and practices that prioritise regime control, stability, and order through economic co-optation, repression of dissent, and the promotion of hegemonic narratives. While studies have examined how illiberal peacebuilding is practiced in various contexts, few have thus far asked how people respond to, and possibly resist, illiberal ideas and practices of peacebuilding. Rather, the existing research on resistance and peacebuilding has primarily focused on local resistance to top-down, often internationally driven liberal peacebuilding. In this article, we address this gap by bringing resistance studies and peacebuilding into greater dialogue and by exploring civil society resistance to illiberal peacebuilding in Myanmar and Sri Lanka. We examine how civil society and social movement actors have resisted regime efforts to build peace through illiberal norms and practices and instead worked to imagine and construct alternative forms of peace that are more inclusive and egalitarian, though not necessarily liberal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conflict Security and Development
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2025.2551561
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resistance to illiberal peacebuilding: towards a new research agenda

Nilanjana Premaratna, Malin Åkebo, Lars Waldorf, Elisabeth Olivius
Conflict Security and Development
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

Resistance to illiberal peacebuilding: towards a new research agenda

Nilanjana Premaratna, Malin Åkebo, Lars Waldorf, Elisabeth Olivius
article en

Abstract

In recent years, liberal peacebuilding has been increasingly displaced by illiberal peacebuilding – illiberal norms and practices that prioritise regime control, stability, and order through economic co-optation, repression of dissent, and the promotion of hegemonic narratives. While studies have examined how illiberal peacebuilding is practiced in various contexts, few have thus far asked how people respond to, and possibly resist, illiberal ideas and practices of peacebuilding. Rather, the existing research on resistance and peacebuilding has primarily focused on local resistance to top-down, often internationally driven liberal peacebuilding. In this article, we address this gap by bringing resistance studies and peacebuilding into greater dialogue and by exploring civil society resistance to illiberal peacebuilding in Myanmar and Sri Lanka. We examine how civil society and social movement actors have resisted regime efforts to build peace through illiberal norms and practices and instead worked to imagine and construct alternative forms of peace that are more inclusive and egalitarian, though not necessarily liberal.

Conflict Security and DevelopmentVol. 25(4)
Northumbria University (GB), Newcastle University (GB), Umeå University (SE)
Vetenskapsrådet
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Resistance to illiberal peacebuilding: towards a new research agenda — Nilanjana Premaratna, Malin Åkebo, et al. · Conflict Security and Development (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS