Contract Embeddings for Layered Control Architectures

The design of complex cyber-physical system architectures is often hierarchical. System specifications are mapped to an implementation layer via a stepwise refinement process involving multiple intermediate layers. These layers may capture different functionalities, and the orchestration of a variety of heterogeneous techniques suited to each layer may be required to achieve the overall design objectives. Due to their heterogeneity, ensuring traceability and verifiability of such architectures is a challenging problem. In this paper, we present a correct-by-construction methodology for designing heterogeneous layered architectures. We capture the specifications at each layer with assume-guarantee contracts , a specification paradigm which can encompass a variety of modeling formalisms. We then use the notion of contract embeddings to define specification refinement , rigorously and traceably mapping specifications across layers modeled with heterogeneous formalisms. We instantiate our methodology on the design of layered control architectures (LCAs), resulting in a novel approach that can verifiably orchestrate domain-specific techniques to satisfy both global planning and local safety requirements. In the context of LCAs, we derive necessary conditions for correct specification refinement and results for compositional realization of control safety specifications. We illustrate our design methodology on a motivating example and a case study derived from robotic mission planning and control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3764587
Primary Topic
Formal Methods in Verification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contract Embeddings for Layered Control Architectures

Alessandro Pinto, Pierluigi Nuzzo, Nikhil Vijay Naik
ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
Formal Methods in Verification
article

Contract Embeddings for Layered Control Architectures

Alessandro Pinto, Pierluigi Nuzzo, Nikhil Vijay Naik
article en

Abstract

The design of complex cyber-physical system architectures is often hierarchical. System specifications are mapped to an implementation layer via a stepwise refinement process involving multiple intermediate layers. These layers may capture different functionalities, and the orchestration of a variety of heterogeneous techniques suited to each layer may be required to achieve the overall design objectives. Due to their heterogeneity, ensuring traceability and verifiability of such architectures is a challenging problem. In this paper, we present a correct-by-construction methodology for designing heterogeneous layered architectures. We capture the specifications at each layer with assume-guarantee contracts , a specification paradigm which can encompass a variety of modeling formalisms. We then use the notion of contract embeddings to define specification refinement , rigorously and traceably mapping specifications across layers modeled with heterogeneous formalisms. We instantiate our methodology on the design of layered control architectures (LCAs), resulting in a novel approach that can verifiably orchestrate domain-specific techniques to satisfy both global planning and local safety requirements. In the context of LCAs, we derive necessary conditions for correct specification refinement and results for compositional realization of control safety specifications. We illustrate our design methodology on a motivating example and a case study derived from robotic mission planning and control.

ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
University of Southern California (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), United Technologies Research Center (IE), DXC Technology (United States) (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, California Institute of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Formal Methods in Verification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.