Labour market differences between immigrant and UK-born employees: What is the role of employers?

ObjectivesThis study aims to investigate the role of employers in labour market disparities between UK-born and immigrant employees using data from the newly linked Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings - 2011 Census for England and Wales. It explores various labour market outcomes, identifying both employer-specific effects and within-employer inequalities. MethodsThe analysis employs well-established regression and decomposition methods to investigate labour market disparities between UK-born and immigrant employees in outcomes such as pay, working hours, occupational skill levels, and temporary employment. Employer-specific effects are incorporated to examine the role of differential sorting of employees across employers and within-employer inequalities. The dataset’s unique employer-employee linked structure enables a precise estimation of the extent to which disparities arise from differences in where immigrant and UK-born employees work versus within-employer dynamics. This approach provides a detailed understanding of how employers’ hiring and pay-setting practices contribute to labour market inequalities. ResultsWe find that immigrants earn less, work longer hours, and are more likely to hold low-skilled or temporary jobs compared to UK-born employees. Adjusting for employee characteristics such as education and work region narrows, but does not eliminate, these gaps, highlighting persistent disparities. Employer-specific effects further reduce the gaps, suggesting that differences in where immigrant and UK-born employees work partly explain the disparities. However, within-employer inequalities persist between comparable immigrant and UK-born employees, with gaps of 2.4% in hourly pay, 3.3% in weekly hours, and 5.9% and 1.8% in low-skilled and temporary employment, respectively. These findings highlight the dual role of employers in shaping labour market inequalities through differential sorting of employees and within-employer practices. ConclusionExploiting the unique features of a linked administrative dataset, this study offers novel insights into labour market disparities between immigrant and UK-born employees by highlighting the role of employers. Our findings suggest that addressing these disparities requires policies targeting both employers' hiring decisions and pay-setting practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Population Data Science
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v10i3.2999
Primary Topic
Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Labour market differences between immigrant and UK-born employees: What is the role of employers?

Ezgi Kaya
International Journal for Population Data Science
Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
article

Labour market differences between immigrant and UK-born employees: What is the role of employers?

Ezgi Kaya
article en

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study aims to investigate the role of employers in labour market disparities between UK-born and immigrant employees using data from the newly linked Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings - 2011 Census for England and Wales. It explores various labour market outcomes, identifying both employer-specific effects and within-employer inequalities. MethodsThe analysis employs well-established regression and decomposition methods to investigate labour market disparities between UK-born and immigrant employees in outcomes such as pay, working hours, occupational skill levels, and temporary employment. Employer-specific effects are incorporated to examine the role of differential sorting of employees across employers and within-employer inequalities. The dataset’s unique employer-employee linked structure enables a precise estimation of the extent to which disparities arise from differences in where immigrant and UK-born employees work versus within-employer dynamics. This approach provides a detailed understanding of how employers’ hiring and pay-setting practices contribute to labour market inequalities. ResultsWe find that immigrants earn less, work longer hours, and are more likely to hold low-skilled or temporary jobs compared to UK-born employees. Adjusting for employee characteristics such as education and work region narrows, but does not eliminate, these gaps, highlighting persistent disparities. Employer-specific effects further reduce the gaps, suggesting that differences in where immigrant and UK-born employees work partly explain the disparities. However, within-employer inequalities persist between comparable immigrant and UK-born employees, with gaps of 2.4% in hourly pay, 3.3% in weekly hours, and 5.9% and 1.8% in low-skilled and temporary employment, respectively. These findings highlight the dual role of employers in shaping labour market inequalities through differential sorting of employees and within-employer practices. ConclusionExploiting the unique features of a linked administrative dataset, this study offers novel insights into labour market disparities between immigrant and UK-born employees by highlighting the role of employers. Our findings suggest that addressing these disparities requires policies targeting both employers' hiring decisions and pay-setting practices.

International Journal for Population Data ScienceVol. 10(4)
Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.