Learning Outcomes in Open Online TRE Training: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation

ObjectivesTo assess the effectiveness and impact of open online Trusted Research Environment (TRE) training through mixed-methods analysis. This study aims to understand participant engagement, satisfaction, and perceived learning outcomes while identifying opportunities for improving program evaluation and learner experience for future program iterations. MethodsA retrospective mixed-methods analysis was conducted using available program data from multiple sources. Data included registration information, usability scales, learning analytics, post-training surveys, participant feedback, and semi-structured interviews. We employed triangulation to validate findings across different data sources. Qualitative data was analysed using thematic and sentimental analysis to identify recurring patterns and learner experience, while descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data from surveys, registration forms, usability scales, and learning analytics extracted from a learning management system. ResultsPreliminary data collection and analysis have already revealed interesting findings. Based on the registration data, over half of the users are academic researchers affiliated with universities. Survey responses submitted by 45 webinar participants yield 98% satisfaction. Sentimental analysis on feedback and interviews demonstrated an overwhelmingly positive learner experience. Interview data provided rich insights into participants’ perceived learning outcomes, with perceived gain as one of the main themes identified for outcome analysis. However, it has also revealed early signs of areas for improvement, including technical support, and dropouts. ConclusionThis assessment provides valuable insights into program effectiveness and areas for improvement. Preliminary findings support the program's positive impact while highlighting areas for improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Population Data Science
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v10i4.3194
Primary Topic
Wikis in Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning Outcomes in Open Online TRE Training: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation

Stephanie J. Lee, Christopher Roberts, David Ford, Simon Thompson et al.
International Journal for Population Data Science
Wikis in Education and Collaboration
article

Learning Outcomes in Open Online TRE Training: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation

Stephanie J. Lee, Christopher Roberts, David Ford, Simon Thompson, Jonathan Smart, Ting Wang, Sinéad Brophy, A.C. Chee
article en

Abstract

ObjectivesTo assess the effectiveness and impact of open online Trusted Research Environment (TRE) training through mixed-methods analysis. This study aims to understand participant engagement, satisfaction, and perceived learning outcomes while identifying opportunities for improving program evaluation and learner experience for future program iterations. MethodsA retrospective mixed-methods analysis was conducted using available program data from multiple sources. Data included registration information, usability scales, learning analytics, post-training surveys, participant feedback, and semi-structured interviews. We employed triangulation to validate findings across different data sources. Qualitative data was analysed using thematic and sentimental analysis to identify recurring patterns and learner experience, while descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data from surveys, registration forms, usability scales, and learning analytics extracted from a learning management system. ResultsPreliminary data collection and analysis have already revealed interesting findings. Based on the registration data, over half of the users are academic researchers affiliated with universities. Survey responses submitted by 45 webinar participants yield 98% satisfaction. Sentimental analysis on feedback and interviews demonstrated an overwhelmingly positive learner experience. Interview data provided rich insights into participants’ perceived learning outcomes, with perceived gain as one of the main themes identified for outcome analysis. However, it has also revealed early signs of areas for improvement, including technical support, and dropouts. ConclusionThis assessment provides valuable insights into program effectiveness and areas for improvement. Preliminary findings support the program's positive impact while highlighting areas for improvement.

International Journal for Population Data ScienceVol. 10(4)
Swansea University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Wikis in Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.