Parametrizing the Hubble function instead of dark energy: Many possibilities

In the present article, we propose a very simple parametrization of the Hubble function without parametrizing the dark components of the Universe. One of the novelties of the parametrization is that it may include a wide variety of the cosmological models, such as dark energy (both noninteracting and interacting fluids), modified gravity, cosmological matter creation, and other known scenarios. The model is constrained with the latest astronomical probes from Hubble parameter measurements, three distinct versions of type Ia Supernovae ($\mathrm{Pantheon}+$, DESY5, Union3) and baryon acoustic oscillations from Sloan Digital Sky Survey and Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument data releases 1 and 2. Our results suggest a mild deviation from the standard $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ cosmological model for most of the combined datasets. We also find that our model is thermodynamically consistent and performs well in the model comparison tests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/l77j-mmhw
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parametrizing the Hubble function instead of dark energy: Many possibilities

Supriya Pan, Surajit Kumar Paul, Raj Kumar Das
4 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
4.62
article

Parametrizing the Hubble function instead of dark energy: Many possibilities

Supriya Pan, Surajit Kumar Paul, Raj Kumar Das
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In the present article, we propose a very simple parametrization of the Hubble function without parametrizing the dark components of the Universe. One of the novelties of the parametrization is that it may include a wide variety of the cosmological models, such as dark energy (both noninteracting and interacting fluids), modified gravity, cosmological matter creation, and other known scenarios. The model is constrained with the latest astronomical probes from Hubble parameter measurements, three distinct versions of type Ia Supernovae ($\mathrm{Pantheon}+$, DESY5, Union3) and baryon acoustic oscillations from Sloan Digital Sky Survey and Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument data releases 1 and 2. Our results suggest a mild deviation from the standard $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ cosmological model for most of the combined datasets. We also find that our model is thermodynamically consistent and performs well in the model comparison tests.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 112(4)
Durban University of Technology (ZA), Indian Statistical Institute (IN)
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
4.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Parametrizing the Hubble function instead of dark energy: Many possibilities — Supriya Pan, Surajit Kumar Paul, et al. · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS