Explained or Certified? Examining the Influence of XAI and AI-Seals on Users’ Trust and Understanding

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) aims to increase users’ understanding and trust in AI-powered systems. However, while XAI has shown benefits, it also comes with shortcomings such as shifting the cognitive burden to users. Certifications, so-called AI-Seals, pose an alternative (or addition) to XAI by signaling a system's trustworthiness through a label. Despite their potential, empirical investigations of AI-Seals remain scarce. In an online experiment (N = 436), a 2 (XAI vs. no XAI) x 2 (AI-Seal vs. no AI-Seal) between-subject design was conducted to analyze the effects of XAI, AI-Seals, or a combination of both on users’ perceived and factual understanding and trust in the AI-application. Results show that XAI led to more perceived and factual understanding but had no effect on trust. Against our assumptions, an AI-Seal could neither promote perceived understanding nor trust. Likewise, the combination did not increase trust but has potential to increase factual understanding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3743049.3743072
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explained or Certified? Examining the Influence of XAI and AI-Seals on Users’ Trust and Understanding

Magdalena Wischnewski, Jessica M. Szczuka, Nicole C. Krämer, Natalia Szymczyk
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Explained or Certified? Examining the Influence of XAI and AI-Seals on Users’ Trust and Understanding

Magdalena Wischnewski, Jessica M. Szczuka, Nicole C. Krämer, Natalia Szymczyk
article en

Abstract

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) aims to increase users’ understanding and trust in AI-powered systems. However, while XAI has shown benefits, it also comes with shortcomings such as shifting the cognitive burden to users. Certifications, so-called AI-Seals, pose an alternative (or addition) to XAI by signaling a system's trustworthiness through a label. Despite their potential, empirical investigations of AI-Seals remain scarce. In an online experiment (N = 436), a 2 (XAI vs. no XAI) x 2 (AI-Seal vs. no AI-Seal) between-subject design was conducted to analyze the effects of XAI, AI-Seals, or a combination of both on users’ perceived and factual understanding and trust in the AI-application. Results show that XAI led to more perceived and factual understanding but had no effect on trust. Against our assumptions, an AI-Seal could neither promote perceived understanding nor trust. Likewise, the combination did not increase trust but has potential to increase factual understanding.

TU Dortmund University (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.