How Can Attention Guiding Techniques Help to Search Efficiently Without Getting Distracted? A Comparative Study.

Attention Guiding Techniques (AGTs) in augmented reality (AR) assistance systems improve visual search efficiency but may cause important events to be missed. This study investigates both effects in a controlled AR environment using HoloLens 2. Participants searched for virtual target objects at varying search angles and reported changes during the task. Three AGT conditions were tested: Highlight, Highlight with 3D Arrow (+3DArrow), and Highlight with Attention Funnel (+AF). Both +3DArrow and +AF improved search times over Highlight. However, +AF was less effective than +3DArrow for targets behind participants. The condition +3DArrow caused significantly more change blindness than Highlight, likely due to the arrow's central field of view (FOV) placement. In contrast, AF's peripheral tunnel rings allowed better monitoring of changes. These results underscore the importance of selecting and designing AGTs according to task context to balance guidance efficiency with situational awareness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3743049.3748544
Primary Topic
Augmented Reality Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Can Attention Guiding Techniques Help to Search Efficiently Without Getting Distracted? A Comparative Study.

Svetlana Wähnert, Laura Biertümpfel
Augmented Reality Applications
article

How Can Attention Guiding Techniques Help to Search Efficiently Without Getting Distracted? A Comparative Study.

Svetlana Wähnert, Laura Biertümpfel
article en

Abstract

Attention Guiding Techniques (AGTs) in augmented reality (AR) assistance systems improve visual search efficiency but may cause important events to be missed. This study investigates both effects in a controlled AR environment using HoloLens 2. Participants searched for virtual target objects at varying search angles and reported changes during the task. Three AGT conditions were tested: Highlight, Highlight with 3D Arrow (+3DArrow), and Highlight with Attention Funnel (+AF). Both +3DArrow and +AF improved search times over Highlight. However, +AF was less effective than +3DArrow for targets behind participants. The condition +3DArrow caused significantly more change blindness than Highlight, likely due to the arrow's central field of view (FOV) placement. In contrast, AF's peripheral tunnel rings allowed better monitoring of changes. These results underscore the importance of selecting and designing AGTs according to task context to balance guidance efficiency with situational awareness.

Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Augmented Reality Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.