Understanding Knowledge Management Systems: Psychological Needs As A Conceptual Lens On User Experience, Research, and Design

Knowledge Management Systems (KMS) are crucial for capturing, sharing, and applying organizational knowledge. While technical and organizational aspects of KMS have been discussed in the HCI literature, the psychological dimension has received less attention. Still psychological need fulfillment and adequately addressing the motivations of different stakeholders could be a deciding factor for their actual usage and success. This paper introduces psychological needs (e.g. autonomy, competence, relatedness, and meaning) as a valuable framework to better select, evaluate, and design KMS. First, the complex landscape of KMS types, use cases and stakeholders is mapped, demonstrating that these classifications often fall short of practical realities. Then psychological needs are proposed as an integrative lens to make sense of this complexity and guide both research and design decisions. This perspective is particularly relevant for UX researchers, designers, and organizational leaders or users in general seeking to foster more suitable Knowledge Management Systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3743049.3748587
Primary Topic
Knowledge Management and Sharing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Knowledge Management Systems: Psychological Needs As A Conceptual Lens On User Experience, Research, and Design

Sarah Diefenbach, Marie Veihelmann
Knowledge Management and Sharing
article

Understanding Knowledge Management Systems: Psychological Needs As A Conceptual Lens On User Experience, Research, and Design

Sarah Diefenbach, Marie Veihelmann
article en

Abstract

Knowledge Management Systems (KMS) are crucial for capturing, sharing, and applying organizational knowledge. While technical and organizational aspects of KMS have been discussed in the HCI literature, the psychological dimension has received less attention. Still psychological need fulfillment and adequately addressing the motivations of different stakeholders could be a deciding factor for their actual usage and success. This paper introduces psychological needs (e.g. autonomy, competence, relatedness, and meaning) as a valuable framework to better select, evaluate, and design KMS. First, the complex landscape of KMS types, use cases and stakeholders is mapped, demonstrating that these classifications often fall short of practical realities. Then psychological needs are proposed as an integrative lens to make sense of this complexity and guide both research and design decisions. This perspective is particularly relevant for UX researchers, designers, and organizational leaders or users in general seeking to foster more suitable Knowledge Management Systems.

LMU Klinikum (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Knowledge Management and Sharing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.