Evaluation of the biotic ligand model for the development of benthic toxicity thresholds and remedial goals for metals at sediment management sites

A combined risk assessment and risk management framework is proposed for application of a multimetal biotic ligand model (mBLM) to develop bulk sediment remedial goals for metals in sediments. Sediment chemistry and toxicity data from five freshwater sediment study areas were compiled to illustrate how this framework could be applied. Based on these data, the mBLM accurately predicted toxicity to Hyalella azteca in 85.3% of the samples with respect to H. azteca 20% effect concentrations (EC20s) and in 75.1% of the samples with respect to derived final chronic values (FCVs). The sum of porewater toxic units derived using the mBLM was converted to a bulk sediment remedial goal concentration (CBSRG) using empirical partitioning relationships between metals in sediments and porewater. A median of the CBSRG values in samples with mBLM-FCV ∑ toxic units (TUs) >1 was used as a first approximation of an overall bulk sediment remedial action level (RAL) to identify sediments most in need of remedial action based on the presence of bioavailable metals in porewater in each study area. Bulk sediment RALs ultimately reflected the relative bioavailability of metals in porewater. Where metal porewater bioavailability was relatively low, RALs were higher than bulk sediment remedial goals. Conversely, where metal porewater bioavailability was relatively high, RALs were lower than bulk sediment remedial goals. There is more uncertainty where porewater metal bioavailability was not the primary driver of toxicity, as evidenced by low mBLM TU, and a high percentage of false-negative toxicity predictions. We conclude that for sediments in which porewater metal bioavailability is the primary contributor to benthic toxicity, porewater-based remedial goals derived using the mBLM can be used to derive bulk sediment remedial goals that are practical for making site remediation decisions yet still reflect metal bioavailability in porewater.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf118
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Heavy metals in environment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the biotic ligand model for the development of benthic toxicity thresholds and remedial goals for metals at sediment management sites

Aaron D. Redman, Robert C. Santore, Robert W. Gensemer, Steven S. S Brown et al.
1 citations
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Heavy metals in environment
0.50
article

Evaluation of the biotic ligand model for the development of benthic toxicity thresholds and remedial goals for metals at sediment management sites

Aaron D. Redman, Robert C. Santore, Robert W. Gensemer, Steven S. S Brown, Bjorn Bjorkman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A combined risk assessment and risk management framework is proposed for application of a multimetal biotic ligand model (mBLM) to develop bulk sediment remedial goals for metals in sediments. Sediment chemistry and toxicity data from five freshwater sediment study areas were compiled to illustrate how this framework could be applied. Based on these data, the mBLM accurately predicted toxicity to Hyalella azteca in 85.3% of the samples with respect to H. azteca 20% effect concentrations (EC20s) and in 75.1% of the samples with respect to derived final chronic values (FCVs). The sum of porewater toxic units derived using the mBLM was converted to a bulk sediment remedial goal concentration (CBSRG) using empirical partitioning relationships between metals in sediments and porewater. A median of the CBSRG values in samples with mBLM-FCV ∑ toxic units (TUs) >1 was used as a first approximation of an overall bulk sediment remedial action level (RAL) to identify sediments most in need of remedial action based on the presence of bioavailable metals in porewater in each study area. Bulk sediment RALs ultimately reflected the relative bioavailability of metals in porewater. Where metal porewater bioavailability was relatively low, RALs were higher than bulk sediment remedial goals. Conversely, where metal porewater bioavailability was relatively high, RALs were lower than bulk sediment remedial goals. There is more uncertainty where porewater metal bioavailability was not the primary driver of toxicity, as evidenced by low mBLM TU, and a high percentage of false-negative toxicity predictions. We conclude that for sediments in which porewater metal bioavailability is the primary contributor to benthic toxicity, porewater-based remedial goals derived using the mBLM can be used to derive bulk sediment remedial goals that are practical for making site remediation decisions yet still reflect metal bioavailability in porewater.

Integrated Environmental Assessment and ManagementVol. 22(2)
Windward Community College (US), Great Lakes Environmental Center (US), GEI Consultants (US), Northwestern Michigan College (US), ExxonMobil (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Heavy metals in environment
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.