Knotless backstitching provides comparable strength to conventional knotting in porcine stomach suture biomechanics

In this biomechanics study, we compared the use of knot fixation or backstitching at the end of a continuous suture with the use of conventional absorbable sutures to close a porcine stomach incision. We then evaluated whether the backstitching method could be considered a novel, surgical, knot-free closure technique. A total of 40 suturing samples were obtained and divided into 20 samples from the posterior wall and 20 from the anterior wall. These sets of 20 samples were then randomly grouped into the backstitching group and the knotting group, with 10 samples per group for each associated wall. Biomechanical tests were performed to compare the maximum load and tensile stiffness differences between the backstitching group and the knotting group. The maximum load and tensile stiffness differences between the backstitching group and the knotting group were not significant for the posterior or anterior walls of the porcine stomach. The use of backstitching at the end of an incision with continuous conventional absorbable sutures provides similar biomechanical properties to those of knot fixation, and the backstitching method shows promise as a novel surgical knot-free closure technique.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15492-w
Primary Topic
Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knotless backstitching provides comparable strength to conventional knotting in porcine stomach suture biomechanics

Weidong Ren, Xiang Wan, Jun Liu, Tao Qin et al.
Scientific Reports
Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
article

Knotless backstitching provides comparable strength to conventional knotting in porcine stomach suture biomechanics

Weidong Ren, Xiang Wan, Jun Liu, Tao Qin, Zhi-Ping Feng
article en

Abstract

In this biomechanics study, we compared the use of knot fixation or backstitching at the end of a continuous suture with the use of conventional absorbable sutures to close a porcine stomach incision. We then evaluated whether the backstitching method could be considered a novel, surgical, knot-free closure technique. A total of 40 suturing samples were obtained and divided into 20 samples from the posterior wall and 20 from the anterior wall. These sets of 20 samples were then randomly grouped into the backstitching group and the knotting group, with 10 samples per group for each associated wall. Biomechanical tests were performed to compare the maximum load and tensile stiffness differences between the backstitching group and the knotting group. The maximum load and tensile stiffness differences between the backstitching group and the knotting group were not significant for the posterior or anterior walls of the porcine stomach. The use of backstitching at the end of an incision with continuous conventional absorbable sutures provides similar biomechanical properties to those of knot fixation, and the backstitching method shows promise as a novel surgical knot-free closure technique.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Ningbo Product Quality Supervision and Inspection Institute (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Knotless backstitching provides comparable strength to conventional knotting in porcine stomach suture biomechanics — Weidong Ren, Xiang Wan, et al. · Scientific Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS