ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: PROBLEMS OF COLLECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF ADMISSIBILITY

This article examines issues related to electronic evidence in criminal proceedings in Ukraine, focusing on the problems of its collection and evaluation under martial law. The legislative framework of Ukraine regarding electronic evidence, which is in the process of being formed, is considered, taking into account the current judicial reform and the desire for European integration. Significant gaps in legal regulation, organizational capacity, and technical infrastructure are identified that make it difficult to effectively work with electronic evidence. Particular attention is paid to the challenges that have arisen as a result of the Russian invasion, in particular, evidence collection in occupied territories, and the destruction of infrastructure. Based on a comprehensive analysis, a multifaceted approach to reform is proposed, encompassing legislative changes, institutional development, strengthening technical capabilities, and the creation of specialized educational programs. The need to form a unified legislative framework for working with electronic evidence, create specialized units in law enforcement agencies, standardize technical equipment, and improve interdisciplinary training of investigators, prosecutors, and judges to ensure the effective and lawful use of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings is highlighted. The conclusions indicate that the problems of the institution of electronic evidence in the Ukrainian criminal process are experiencing considerable difficulties, which are exacerbated against the backdrop of war realities. These difficulties concern the legislative field, organizational structure, technological support and practical implementation, which requires holistic solutions focused both on ensuring operational needs and on the strategic development of the system in the future. Despite this, Ukrainian investigators, prosecutors and judges have shown the ability to adapt, introducing innovative methods of collecting and evaluating electronic evidence even during active hostilities. International cooperation has played an important role in the exchange of experience and the formation of professional competencies, strengthening the overall potential of Ukraine in the field of electronic evidence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Notes Series Law
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36550/2522-9230-2025-18-196-201
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: PROBLEMS OF COLLECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF ADMISSIBILITY

Ніна Зіновіївна Рогатинська, I. Letnyak
Scientific Notes Series Law
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: PROBLEMS OF COLLECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF ADMISSIBILITY

Ніна Зіновіївна Рогатинська, I. Letnyak
article en

Abstract

This article examines issues related to electronic evidence in criminal proceedings in Ukraine, focusing on the problems of its collection and evaluation under martial law. The legislative framework of Ukraine regarding electronic evidence, which is in the process of being formed, is considered, taking into account the current judicial reform and the desire for European integration. Significant gaps in legal regulation, organizational capacity, and technical infrastructure are identified that make it difficult to effectively work with electronic evidence. Particular attention is paid to the challenges that have arisen as a result of the Russian invasion, in particular, evidence collection in occupied territories, and the destruction of infrastructure. Based on a comprehensive analysis, a multifaceted approach to reform is proposed, encompassing legislative changes, institutional development, strengthening technical capabilities, and the creation of specialized educational programs. The need to form a unified legislative framework for working with electronic evidence, create specialized units in law enforcement agencies, standardize technical equipment, and improve interdisciplinary training of investigators, prosecutors, and judges to ensure the effective and lawful use of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings is highlighted. The conclusions indicate that the problems of the institution of electronic evidence in the Ukrainian criminal process are experiencing considerable difficulties, which are exacerbated against the backdrop of war realities. These difficulties concern the legislative field, organizational structure, technological support and practical implementation, which requires holistic solutions focused both on ensuring operational needs and on the strategic development of the system in the future. Despite this, Ukrainian investigators, prosecutors and judges have shown the ability to adapt, introducing innovative methods of collecting and evaluating electronic evidence even during active hostilities. International cooperation has played an important role in the exchange of experience and the formation of professional competencies, strengthening the overall potential of Ukraine in the field of electronic evidence.

Scientific Notes Series LawVol. 1(18)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: PROBLEMS OF COLLECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF ADMISSIBILITY — Ніна Зіновіївна Рогатинська, I. Letnyak · Scientific Notes Series Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS