Sex differences in upper-body strength, lean mass, and bone density across the adult lifespan: insights into musculoskeletal aging and strength preservation

Aging is associated with declines in upper-body strength, lean mass, and bone mineral density (BMD), yet sex-specific patterns of musculoskeletal aging remain unclear. This study examined the relationships between upper-body strength, lean mass, and arm BMD across the adult lifespan in male and female participants. Upper-body strength [free-weight bench press one-repetition maximum (1RM)], arm BMD [g/cm<sup>2</sup> via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)], and lean body mass (kg via DXA) were assessed in 174 adults (105 females, 69 males; mean age = 53.5 ± 17.4 yr). Hierarchical linear regression models examined associations between strength, BMD, and lean mass. Age was associated with lower bench press 1RM (β = -0.32, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and arm BMD (β = -0.27, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and was marginally significant with lean mass (β = -0.13, <i>P</i> = 0.08). Male participants exhibited a stronger negative association between age and strength (β = -0.19, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Female participants exhibited a marginally stronger negative association between age and arm BMD (β = 0.22, <i>P</i> = 0.061). Upper-body strength was positively associated with arm BMD (β = 0.34, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and the strength of this relationship increased with age (β = 0.11, <i>P</i> < 0.05) and was stronger in female participants (β = -0.56, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Upper-body lean mass was associated with strength (β = 0.62, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and BMD (β = 0.43, <i>P</i> < 0.001), but the strength-mass association weakened with age (β = -0.15, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and was stronger in males (β = 0.39, <i>P</i> < 0.001). These findings highlight the sex-specific differences in musculoskeletal aging, emphasizing the importance of strength preservation, particularly in female participants, for mitigating bone loss and osteoporosis risk.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study reveals that upper-body strength declines more rapidly in males than females with age, whereas trending results suggest that bone mineral density may show a stronger decline in female participants. We found that upper-body strength and lean mass predict arm bone mineral density, and these relationships strengthen with age. These findings highlight the importance of maintaining upper-body strength for skeletal health, particularly in female participants, to mitigate osteoporosis risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00544.2025
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex differences in upper-body strength, lean mass, and bone density across the adult lifespan: insights into musculoskeletal aging and strength preservation

William J. Kraemer, Noor F Chaudhry, James A. Oñate, Matthew Stauder et al.
Journal of Applied Physiology
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Sex differences in upper-body strength, lean mass, and bone density across the adult lifespan: insights into musculoskeletal aging and strength preservation

William J. Kraemer, Noor F Chaudhry, James A. Oñate, Matthew Stauder, Jeff S. Volek, Maren S Fragala, Scott M. Hayes, Jillian H Graham
article en

Abstract

Aging is associated with declines in upper-body strength, lean mass, and bone mineral density (BMD), yet sex-specific patterns of musculoskeletal aging remain unclear. This study examined the relationships between upper-body strength, lean mass, and arm BMD across the adult lifespan in male and female participants. Upper-body strength [free-weight bench press one-repetition maximum (1RM)], arm BMD [g/cm<sup>2</sup> via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)], and lean body mass (kg via DXA) were assessed in 174 adults (105 females, 69 males; mean age = 53.5 ± 17.4 yr). Hierarchical linear regression models examined associations between strength, BMD, and lean mass. Age was associated with lower bench press 1RM (β = -0.32, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and arm BMD (β = -0.27, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and was marginally significant with lean mass (β = -0.13, <i>P</i> = 0.08). Male participants exhibited a stronger negative association between age and strength (β = -0.19, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Female participants exhibited a marginally stronger negative association between age and arm BMD (β = 0.22, <i>P</i> = 0.061). Upper-body strength was positively associated with arm BMD (β = 0.34, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and the strength of this relationship increased with age (β = 0.11, <i>P</i> < 0.05) and was stronger in female participants (β = -0.56, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Upper-body lean mass was associated with strength (β = 0.62, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and BMD (β = 0.43, <i>P</i> < 0.001), but the strength-mass association weakened with age (β = -0.15, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and was stronger in males (β = 0.39, <i>P</i> < 0.001). These findings highlight the sex-specific differences in musculoskeletal aging, emphasizing the importance of strength preservation, particularly in female participants, for mitigating bone loss and osteoporosis risk.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study reveals that upper-body strength declines more rapidly in males than females with age, whereas trending results suggest that bone mineral density may show a stronger decline in female participants. We found that upper-body strength and lean mass predict arm bone mineral density, and these relationships strengthen with age. These findings highlight the importance of maintaining upper-body strength for skeletal health, particularly in female participants, to mitigate osteoporosis risk.

Journal of Applied PhysiologyVol. 139(4)
University of North Texas (US), Filtration Solutions (United States) (US), The Ohio State University (US)
National Institute on Aging
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.