On the Benefits of Tower-Mounted Measurement of Near-Surface Quasi-Static Electric Fields

Abstract Measurements and analyses of atmospheric electric fields in the frequency range from DC to a few hertz are employed in Earth and atmospheric sciences to evaluate cloud electrification, thunderstorm evolution, near-surface sources of charge production and separation, and the global electric circuit (GEC). Most operational and research uses of these data are limited by the difficulty in obtaining measurements that are minimally impacted by nearby low-mobility electrically charged particles (space charge) and near-surface radioactive sources. One such operational use is by U.S.-based space launch facilities to avoid lightning strikes to a launch vehicle during ascent. Ground-based electric field measurements are a key part of these rules, with assessments being limited by nearby “noise sources.” Additionally, GEC research is seriously hampered by the difficulty in obtaining low-noise measurements of the fair-weather electric field for individual days. In this work, we discuss our efforts to improve atmospheric electric field observations by placing an electric field mill (EFM) atop a 90-m tower, compensating for the field enhancement produced by this mounting geometry, and comparing its calibrated field measurements to those measured at three nearby ground-mounted EFMs at Kennedy Space Center. The tower installation exhibited only benefits, relative to nearby surface-mounted sites, in the form of reduced sensitivity to wind and near-surface space charge sources, reduced influence of the “sunrise effect,” reduced sensitivity to charged precipitation during warm rain, and insensitivity to nearby vegetation growth. Measurements of electric fields produced by nearby thunderstorms were not compromised by this tower-mounted configuration. Significance Statement Slowly varying electric fields in the atmosphere can be used to evaluate thunderstorm electrical charges and the daily electric field variations that they produce at remote locations, as part of the global electric circuit. Most operational and research uses of these data are limited by the difficulty in obtaining measurements that are minimally impacted by nearby noise and sources of error. One important operational use is by space launch facilities that are required to follow strict launch rules to avoid intercepting or triggering lightning by a launch vehicle during ascent. In this work, we discuss the significant benefits of making these measurements atop a 90-m tower and comparing them to fields measured on the ground at Kennedy Space Center.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-25-0010.1
Primary Topic
Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Benefits of Tower-Mounted Measurement of Near-Surface Quasi-Static Electric Fields

Kenneth L. Cummins, C. J. Biagi, Amitabh Nag, H. K. Rassoul et al.
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
article

On the Benefits of Tower-Mounted Measurement of Near-Surface Quasi-Static Electric Fields

Kenneth L. Cummins, C. J. Biagi, Amitabh Nag, H. K. Rassoul, Alex Tempert, Mathieu N. Plaisir
article en

Abstract

Abstract Measurements and analyses of atmospheric electric fields in the frequency range from DC to a few hertz are employed in Earth and atmospheric sciences to evaluate cloud electrification, thunderstorm evolution, near-surface sources of charge production and separation, and the global electric circuit (GEC). Most operational and research uses of these data are limited by the difficulty in obtaining measurements that are minimally impacted by nearby low-mobility electrically charged particles (space charge) and near-surface radioactive sources. One such operational use is by U.S.-based space launch facilities to avoid lightning strikes to a launch vehicle during ascent. Ground-based electric field measurements are a key part of these rules, with assessments being limited by nearby “noise sources.” Additionally, GEC research is seriously hampered by the difficulty in obtaining low-noise measurements of the fair-weather electric field for individual days. In this work, we discuss our efforts to improve atmospheric electric field observations by placing an electric field mill (EFM) atop a 90-m tower, compensating for the field enhancement produced by this mounting geometry, and comparing its calibrated field measurements to those measured at three nearby ground-mounted EFMs at Kennedy Space Center. The tower installation exhibited only benefits, relative to nearby surface-mounted sites, in the form of reduced sensitivity to wind and near-surface space charge sources, reduced influence of the “sunrise effect,” reduced sensitivity to charged precipitation during warm rain, and insensitivity to nearby vegetation growth. Measurements of electric fields produced by nearby thunderstorms were not compromised by this tower-mounted configuration. Significance Statement Slowly varying electric fields in the atmosphere can be used to evaluate thunderstorm electrical charges and the daily electric field variations that they produce at remote locations, as part of the global electric circuit. Most operational and research uses of these data are limited by the difficulty in obtaining measurements that are minimally impacted by nearby noise and sources of error. One important operational use is by space launch facilities that are required to follow strict launch rules to avoid intercepting or triggering lightning by a launch vehicle during ascent. In this work, we discuss the significant benefits of making these measurements atop a 90-m tower and comparing them to fields measured on the ground at Kennedy Space Center.

Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic TechnologyVol. 42(10)
Florida Institute of Technology (US), Los Alamos National Laboratory (US), University of Arizona (US), Kennedy Space Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.