Breast Biopsy Rates and Market Dynamics: How Provider Environment Shaped Diagnostic Practice in 2023

Abstract Introduction Guidelines for breast cancer screening aim to increase early detection and survival. However diagnostic follow-up relies on provider discretion, leading to variability in subsequent care and total cost. We sought to identify factors correlated to market-level biopsy variability. Methods Commercial claims and physician data for 2023 were sourced from Definitive Healthcare databases. Utilization rates were regressed on and adjusted for demographics in each Hospital Referral Region (HRR). HRRs were then categorized along three distinct axes: (1) degree of risk-sharing, (2) commonality of in-house diagnostics and (3) degree of academic-influence. Results While demographic factors account for screening differences, there remained much geographic variance in demographics-adjusted biopsy utilization, even for similar breast resection rates (indicative of true-positives). However, markets dominated by risk-sharing practices had lower biopsy rates (-0.4%, p=0.01), while those where screening, biopsy, and resection occur within the same provider system had higher rates (+0.9%, p<0.01). Similarly, biopsy rates were elevated in markets with academic medical centers and NCI-designated cancer centers (+0.6%, p=0.02). Conclusion These findings suggest provider-environment—both financial and cultural—affects market-level biopsy rate. The variation found indicates biopsy-overutilization is a non-zero factor in the cost of breast-cancer detection, underscoring the importance of consistent standards in mammogram-reading.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs Scholar
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf171
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breast Biopsy Rates and Market Dynamics: How Provider Environment Shaped Diagnostic Practice in 2023

Sarah J. Dolman, Jacob Wiesenthal, David A Kaufmann
Health Affairs Scholar
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Breast Biopsy Rates and Market Dynamics: How Provider Environment Shaped Diagnostic Practice in 2023

Sarah J. Dolman, Jacob Wiesenthal, David A Kaufmann
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Guidelines for breast cancer screening aim to increase early detection and survival. However diagnostic follow-up relies on provider discretion, leading to variability in subsequent care and total cost. We sought to identify factors correlated to market-level biopsy variability. Methods Commercial claims and physician data for 2023 were sourced from Definitive Healthcare databases. Utilization rates were regressed on and adjusted for demographics in each Hospital Referral Region (HRR). HRRs were then categorized along three distinct axes: (1) degree of risk-sharing, (2) commonality of in-house diagnostics and (3) degree of academic-influence. Results While demographic factors account for screening differences, there remained much geographic variance in demographics-adjusted biopsy utilization, even for similar breast resection rates (indicative of true-positives). However, markets dominated by risk-sharing practices had lower biopsy rates (-0.4%, p=0.01), while those where screening, biopsy, and resection occur within the same provider system had higher rates (+0.9%, p<0.01). Similarly, biopsy rates were elevated in markets with academic medical centers and NCI-designated cancer centers (+0.6%, p=0.02). Conclusion These findings suggest provider-environment—both financial and cultural—affects market-level biopsy rate. The variation found indicates biopsy-overutilization is a non-zero factor in the cost of breast-cancer detection, underscoring the importance of consistent standards in mammogram-reading.

Health Affairs Scholar
Global Strategy Group (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.