Asymmetric Nash Bargaining Compensation Mechanism With Individual Limited Budgets for Minimum Cost Consensus in Social Network

In green supply chain initiatives, small suppliers often struggle to achieve collaborative adjustment goals due to limited budgets, even when overall resources are sufficient. This reflects a common challenge in group decision making (GDM) under individual budget constraints. To address this, a novel framework is proposed for achieving group consensus in social networks with limited individual budgets. First, the minimum cost consensus model (MCCM) is extended by introducing a budget relaxation method to explore the potential of Pareto improvement when strict budget constraints hinder consensus. To realize this potential, an asymmetric Nash bargaining cost allocation model with compensation factors is developed to fairly distribute consensus costs within individual budgets. On this basis, an asymmetric Nash bargaining compensation mechanism in ego-networks is designed, reflecting the reality that in decentralized decision-making scenarios, compensation typically occurs among directly connected individuals due to stronger trust, more frequent interactions, and shared interests. This mechanism enables DM to negotiate and reallocate resources within their local social circles, balancing individual and collective benefits and enhancing the feasibility of cooperation. The effectiveness of the proposed framework is demonstrated through an illustrative example.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2025.3598302
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sharing Economy and Platforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.07

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Asymmetric Nash Bargaining Compensation Mechanism With Individual Limited Budgets for Minimum Cost Consensus in Social Network

Francisco Chiclana, Jian Wu, Jackson Jinhong Mi, Mingshuo Cao et al.
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems
Sharing Economy and Platforms
2.07
article

Asymmetric Nash Bargaining Compensation Mechanism With Individual Limited Budgets for Minimum Cost Consensus in Social Network

Francisco Chiclana, Jian Wu, Jackson Jinhong Mi, Mingshuo Cao, Yang Jie
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In green supply chain initiatives, small suppliers often struggle to achieve collaborative adjustment goals due to limited budgets, even when overall resources are sufficient. This reflects a common challenge in group decision making (GDM) under individual budget constraints. To address this, a novel framework is proposed for achieving group consensus in social networks with limited individual budgets. First, the minimum cost consensus model (MCCM) is extended by introducing a budget relaxation method to explore the potential of Pareto improvement when strict budget constraints hinder consensus. To realize this potential, an asymmetric Nash bargaining cost allocation model with compensation factors is developed to fairly distribute consensus costs within individual budgets. On this basis, an asymmetric Nash bargaining compensation mechanism in ego-networks is designed, reflecting the reality that in decentralized decision-making scenarios, compensation typically occurs among directly connected individuals due to stronger trust, more frequent interactions, and shared interests. This mechanism enables DM to negotiate and reallocate resources within their local social circles, balancing individual and collective benefits and enhancing the feasibility of cooperation. The effectiveness of the proposed framework is demonstrated through an illustrative example.

IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics SystemsVol. 55(11)
De Montfort University (GB), Shanghai Maritime University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sharing Economy and Platforms
2.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.