CAMELS Based Rating: Comparative Analysis of Conventional Banks (CBs) and Islamic Banks (IBs) in Pakistan

This study investigated the performance differences between IBs and CBs in Pakistan using the CAMELS rating framework. The study analyzed three IBs and same number of three CBs for the period of 2011-2023. The research employed both independent sample t-tests and logistic regression analysis. The results show that IBs excel in AQ and sensitivity to market risk, reflecting their strengths in maintaining low levels of non-performing assets and effective risk management practices. On the other hand, CBs perform better in earnings and liquidity, indicating more efficient profit generation and liquidity management. However, both types of banks need to improve in Management Quality, highlighting the importance of enhancing operational efficiency and governance. The study suggests that IBs should focus on increasing profitability and improving liquidity management while adhering to Shariah principles. CBs should adopt risk-sharing mechanisms and ethical practices to enhance stakeholder confidence and ensure long-term sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Journal for Social Affairs
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71317/rjsa.003.05.0372
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CAMELS Based Rating: Comparative Analysis of Conventional Banks (CBs) and Islamic Banks (IBs) in Pakistan

Aamir Sarwar, Muhammad Junaid Alam, Afzal Mahmood, Asmat N. Khattak
Research Journal for Social Affairs
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
article

CAMELS Based Rating: Comparative Analysis of Conventional Banks (CBs) and Islamic Banks (IBs) in Pakistan

Aamir Sarwar, Muhammad Junaid Alam, Afzal Mahmood, Asmat N. Khattak
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the performance differences between IBs and CBs in Pakistan using the CAMELS rating framework. The study analyzed three IBs and same number of three CBs for the period of 2011-2023. The research employed both independent sample t-tests and logistic regression analysis. The results show that IBs excel in AQ and sensitivity to market risk, reflecting their strengths in maintaining low levels of non-performing assets and effective risk management practices. On the other hand, CBs perform better in earnings and liquidity, indicating more efficient profit generation and liquidity management. However, both types of banks need to improve in Management Quality, highlighting the importance of enhancing operational efficiency and governance. The study suggests that IBs should focus on increasing profitability and improving liquidity management while adhering to Shariah principles. CBs should adopt risk-sharing mechanisms and ethical practices to enhance stakeholder confidence and ensure long-term sustainability.

Research Journal for Social AffairsVol. 3(5)
University of the Punjab (PK), Lahore Leads University (PK), Institute of Management Sciences Lahore (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.