Fast and Accurate Comparison of Protein Conformational Ensembles

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations yield varied results based on simulation conditions; therefore, the results must be compared across different conditions. Previous studies have introduced measures to compare two protein conformational ensembles, each containing multiple protein structures, generated via MD simulations. However, existing brute-force algorithms for computing measures, such as the minimum root mean square deviation (RMSD) and average minimum RMSD, require O(nNM)-time, where n denotes the protein length and N and M are the number of structures in each ensemble. This time complexity can be prohibitively slow when comparing two conformational ensembles generated via long MD simulations. We propose three faster heuristic methods—single-direction method, dual-direction method, and all-direction method—for computing the minimum RMSD and average minimum RMSD in O(n(N+M))-time using the SMAWK algorithm. Experiments on an MD simulation dataset with (N, M) =(10,000, 10,000) demonstrated that the all-direction method was the most accurate, while the single-direction method was the fastest among the proposed methods. The all-direction method achieved average approximation ratios of 1.058 and 1.174 for the minimum RMSD and average minimum RMSD, respectively. The mean absolute error for the minimum RMSD using the all-direction method was approximately three times smaller, and that for the average minimum RMSD was approximately 1.6 times smaller compared with that of the single-direction method. The single-direction method was approximately 1,980 times faster than the existing brute-force algorithm in computing the minimum RMSD and average minimum RMSD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IPSJ Transactions on Bioinformatics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2197/ipsjtbio.18.20
Primary Topic
Protein Structure and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fast and Accurate Comparison of Protein Conformational Ensembles

Bunsho Koyano, Tetsuo Shibuya
IPSJ Transactions on Bioinformatics
Protein Structure and Dynamics
article

Fast and Accurate Comparison of Protein Conformational Ensembles

Bunsho Koyano, Tetsuo Shibuya
article en

Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations yield varied results based on simulation conditions; therefore, the results must be compared across different conditions. Previous studies have introduced measures to compare two protein conformational ensembles, each containing multiple protein structures, generated via MD simulations. However, existing brute-force algorithms for computing measures, such as the minimum root mean square deviation (RMSD) and average minimum RMSD, require O(nNM)-time, where n denotes the protein length and N and M are the number of structures in each ensemble. This time complexity can be prohibitively slow when comparing two conformational ensembles generated via long MD simulations. We propose three faster heuristic methods—single-direction method, dual-direction method, and all-direction method—for computing the minimum RMSD and average minimum RMSD in O(n(N+M))-time using the SMAWK algorithm. Experiments on an MD simulation dataset with (N, M) =(10,000, 10,000) demonstrated that the all-direction method was the most accurate, while the single-direction method was the fastest among the proposed methods. The all-direction method achieved average approximation ratios of 1.058 and 1.174 for the minimum RMSD and average minimum RMSD, respectively. The mean absolute error for the minimum RMSD using the all-direction method was approximately three times smaller, and that for the average minimum RMSD was approximately 1.6 times smaller compared with that of the single-direction method. The single-direction method was approximately 1,980 times faster than the existing brute-force algorithm in computing the minimum RMSD and average minimum RMSD.

IPSJ Transactions on BioinformaticsVol. 18(0)
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Protein Structure and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fast and Accurate Comparison of Protein Conformational Ensembles — Bunsho Koyano, Tetsuo Shibuya · IPSJ Transactions on Bioinformatics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS