Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Enhanced Lymphoma Diagnosis

Lymphoma diagnosis remains a clinical challenge due to its biological heterogeneity, concurrent symptoms, and often uncertain initial manifestations. This study proposes an integrated data-driven system combining supervised machine learning and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to enhance clinical interpretability and diagnostic accuracy. The method ranks patient cases based on the relative severity of diagnostic factors such as CRP, LDH, hemoglobin, WBC, platelet count, tumor size, and age using an entropy-weighted TOPSIS model. Two thousand simulated patient profiles were created in a clinically informative dataset for validating and testing the system. The same set of features was used for training a Random Forest classifier to gauge the decision model's robustness. The classifier obtained an AUC of 0.53 and a prediction accuracy of 54.75%. Performance metrics were highly aligned with MCDA-generated rankings , and the three most important diagnostic markers – LDH, CRP, and hemoglobin – were always among both the machine learning models and the MCDA rankings. Complementary approaches like Principal Component Analysis (PCA), correlation heatmaps, ROC plots, and decision tree visualizations supported the models' structure and interpretability. The results show that the combination of MCDA and data-driven classification has the promise to aid the creation of transparent, flexible, and clinically meaningful diagnostic systems. This hybrid system supports future precision medicine uses, such as integration with imaging modalities, longitudinal monitoring of patients, and molecular data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of University of Babylon for Engineering Sciences
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29196/jubes.v33i4.5890
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Enhanced Lymphoma Diagnosis

Ali Tawfeeq Lateef Hammoodi
Journal of University of Babylon for Engineering Sciences
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
article

Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Enhanced Lymphoma Diagnosis

Ali Tawfeeq Lateef Hammoodi
article en

Abstract

Lymphoma diagnosis remains a clinical challenge due to its biological heterogeneity, concurrent symptoms, and often uncertain initial manifestations. This study proposes an integrated data-driven system combining supervised machine learning and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to enhance clinical interpretability and diagnostic accuracy. The method ranks patient cases based on the relative severity of diagnostic factors such as CRP, LDH, hemoglobin, WBC, platelet count, tumor size, and age using an entropy-weighted TOPSIS model. Two thousand simulated patient profiles were created in a clinically informative dataset for validating and testing the system. The same set of features was used for training a Random Forest classifier to gauge the decision model's robustness. The classifier obtained an AUC of 0.53 and a prediction accuracy of 54.75%. Performance metrics were highly aligned with MCDA-generated rankings , and the three most important diagnostic markers – LDH, CRP, and hemoglobin – were always among both the machine learning models and the MCDA rankings. Complementary approaches like Principal Component Analysis (PCA), correlation heatmaps, ROC plots, and decision tree visualizations supported the models' structure and interpretability. The results show that the combination of MCDA and data-driven classification has the promise to aid the creation of transparent, flexible, and clinically meaningful diagnostic systems. This hybrid system supports future precision medicine uses, such as integration with imaging modalities, longitudinal monitoring of patients, and molecular data.

Journal of University of Babylon for Engineering SciencesVol. 33(4)
University of Babylon (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.