From motion to metabolism: investigating the relationship between accelerometer and VO<sub>2</sub> metrics across five age groups for optimal calibration of physical activity intensity

<i>Objective.</i>The aim was to examine the relationship between accelerometer and oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>) metrics and to what extent the metrics are normalized across age and body size, to allow a single calibration regression line for absolute physical activity (PA) intensity.<i>Approach.</i>Hip-mounted accelerometer data and VO<sub>2</sub>measurements were collected from 51 participants across five age cohorts (4-5; 6-8; 10; 15 and 20 years) during resting, walking and running on a treadmill in laboratory setting. Linear regressions were used to determine four accelerometer metrics' (AG, 4 Hz frequency extended method (FEM), 10 Hz FEM and Euclidean norm minus one) contribution to explained variance (adjusted<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) in six VO<sub>2</sub>metrics (VO<sub>2</sub>, VO<sub>2</sub><b>/</b>kg<sup>1</sup>, VO<sub>2</sub><b>/</b>kg<sup>0.67</sup>, VO<sub>2</sub><b>/</b>kg<sup>0.75</sup>, MET<sub>measured</sub>and MET<sub>fixed</sub>). Plots were generated for visual representations together with log-linear regression, finding the optimal scaling exponent for VO<sub>2</sub>.<i>Main result.</i>10 Hz FEM explained the highest amount of explained variance when related to VO<sub>2</sub><b>/</b>kg<sup>0.75</sup>, 92.4%, with minimal remaining between-group and inter-individual variance. The relationship demonstrated a linear shape. The most used accelerometer metric, AG counts, together with traditionally used reference standard, MET<sub>fixed</sub>, show substantially lower explained variance, 60.2%, with large between-group and inter-individual variance, insufficiently adjusting for physiological and biomechanical variability. The best body weight scaling factor for VO<sub>2</sub>was 0.77. Findings support the use of a single linear calibration regression line for absolute PA intensity across wide-ranging age-groups, accounting for biomechanical and physiological variance.<i>Significance.</i>This enables reliable and meaningful comparisons of PA intensity across age-groups, possibly also across childhood into adulthood, overcoming traditional limitations and enhancing research quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiological Measurement
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ae008e
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From motion to metabolism: investigating the relationship between accelerometer and VO2 metrics across five age groups for optimal calibration of physical activity intensity

Jonatan Fridolfsson, Mats Börjesson, Pia Skovdahl, Daniel Arvidsson et al.
Physiological Measurement
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

From motion to metabolism: investigating the relationship between accelerometer and VO2 metrics across five age groups for optimal calibration of physical activity intensity

Jonatan Fridolfsson, Mats Börjesson, Pia Skovdahl, Daniel Arvidsson, Inas Abed
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>The aim was to examine the relationship between accelerometer and oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>) metrics and to what extent the metrics are normalized across age and body size, to allow a single calibration regression line for absolute physical activity (PA) intensity.<i>Approach.</i>Hip-mounted accelerometer data and VO<sub>2</sub>measurements were collected from 51 participants across five age cohorts (4-5; 6-8; 10; 15 and 20 years) during resting, walking and running on a treadmill in laboratory setting. Linear regressions were used to determine four accelerometer metrics' (AG, 4 Hz frequency extended method (FEM), 10 Hz FEM and Euclidean norm minus one) contribution to explained variance (adjusted<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) in six VO<sub>2</sub>metrics (VO<sub>2</sub>, VO<sub>2</sub><b>/</b>kg<sup>1</sup>, VO<sub>2</sub><b>/</b>kg<sup>0.67</sup>, VO<sub>2</sub><b>/</b>kg<sup>0.75</sup>, MET<sub>measured</sub>and MET<sub>fixed</sub>). Plots were generated for visual representations together with log-linear regression, finding the optimal scaling exponent for VO<sub>2</sub>.<i>Main result.</i>10 Hz FEM explained the highest amount of explained variance when related to VO<sub>2</sub><b>/</b>kg<sup>0.75</sup>, 92.4%, with minimal remaining between-group and inter-individual variance. The relationship demonstrated a linear shape. The most used accelerometer metric, AG counts, together with traditionally used reference standard, MET<sub>fixed</sub>, show substantially lower explained variance, 60.2%, with large between-group and inter-individual variance, insufficiently adjusting for physiological and biomechanical variability. The best body weight scaling factor for VO<sub>2</sub>was 0.77. Findings support the use of a single linear calibration regression line for absolute PA intensity across wide-ranging age-groups, accounting for biomechanical and physiological variance.<i>Significance.</i>This enables reliable and meaningful comparisons of PA intensity across age-groups, possibly also across childhood into adulthood, overcoming traditional limitations and enhancing research quality.

Physiological MeasurementVol. 46(9)
Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.