From motion to metabolism: investigating the relationship between accelerometer and VO<sub>2</sub> metrics across five age groups for optimal calibration of physical activity intensity
<i>Objective.</i>The aim was to examine the relationship between accelerometer and oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>) metrics and to what extent the metrics are normalized across age and body size, to allow a single calibration regression line for absolute physical activity (PA) intensity.<i>Approach.</i>Hip-mounted accelerometer data and VO<sub>2</sub>measurements were collected from 51 participants across five age cohorts (4-5; 6-8; 10; 15 and 20 years) during resting, walking and running on a treadmill in laboratory setting. Linear regressions were used to determine four accelerometer metrics' (AG, 4 Hz frequency extended method (FEM), 10 Hz FEM and Euclidean norm minus one) contribution to explained variance (adjusted<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) in six VO<sub>2</sub>metrics (VO<sub>2</sub>, VO<sub>2</sub><b>/</b>kg<sup>1</sup>, VO<sub>2</sub><b>/</b>kg<sup>0.67</sup>, VO<sub>2</sub><b>/</b>kg<sup>0.75</sup>, MET<sub>measured</sub>and MET<sub>fixed</sub>). Plots were generated for visual representations together with log-linear regression, finding the optimal scaling exponent for VO<sub>2</sub>.<i>Main result.</i>10 Hz FEM explained the highest amount of explained variance when related to VO<sub>2</sub><b>/</b>kg<sup>0.75</sup>, 92.4%, with minimal remaining between-group and inter-individual variance. The relationship demonstrated a linear shape. The most used accelerometer metric, AG counts, together with traditionally used reference standard, MET<sub>fixed</sub>, show substantially lower explained variance, 60.2%, with large between-group and inter-individual variance, insufficiently adjusting for physiological and biomechanical variability. The best body weight scaling factor for VO<sub>2</sub>was 0.77. Findings support the use of a single linear calibration regression line for absolute PA intensity across wide-ranging age-groups, accounting for biomechanical and physiological variance.<i>Significance.</i>This enables reliable and meaningful comparisons of PA intensity across age-groups, possibly also across childhood into adulthood, overcoming traditional limitations and enhancing research quality.
Authors
- Jonatan Fridolfsson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7003-4025)
- Mats Börjesson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8786-0438)
- Pia Skovdahl (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0504-2835)
- Daniel Arvidsson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3112-5434)
- Inas Abed
Institutions
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Physiological Measurement
- Published
- 2025-08-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ae008e
- Primary Topic
- Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00