Electron density measurements by Thomson scattering and Stark broadening in nanosecond pulsed CH<sub>4</sub>/Ar plasma

Abstract Two independent approaches for electron density ( n e ) measurements, i.e. Thomson scattering and Stark broadening, are compared against each other in a nanosecond pulsed CH 4 /Ar plasma across a range of conditions (60–500 mbar and 0.5%–2.0% CH 4 ). Reasonable agreement is found between the two techniques up to 0.8 µ s after the plasma pulse, when coherent and incoherent scattering features start to simultaneously appear in the Thomson scattering spectrum. After 2.6 µ s, only incoherent scattering remains, resulting in a more accurate estimation of n e compared to Stark broadening, as the latter suffers from a low signal-to-noise ratio. The maximum n e is proportional to the total gas pressure and varies from 7 × 10 22 m −3 at 60 mbar to 1.4 × 10 23 m −3 at 500 mbar, whereas CH 4 admixing was found to lower the n e . The electron temperature ( T e ), estimated from Thomson scattering spectra, rises from ∼18 000 K to 29 600 K (1.55–2.55 eV) with increasing gas pressure, whilst being mostly independent of the CH 4 admixing ratio. This comparison of the two methods provides guidance to the application of Thomson scattering and Stark broadening in nanosecond pulsed plasmas, highlighting the ranges of experimental conditions and time windows where accurate estimations of n e and T e are feasible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physics D Applied Physics
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ae0046
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electron density measurements by Thomson scattering and Stark broadening in nanosecond pulsed CH4/Ar plasma

Rino Morent, Qing Xiong, Annemie Bogaerts, Anton Yu Nikiforov et al.
1 citations
Journal of Physics D Applied Physics
Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
0.86
article

Electron density measurements by Thomson scattering and Stark broadening in nanosecond pulsed CH4/Ar plasma

Rino Morent, Qing Xiong, Annemie Bogaerts, Anton Yu Nikiforov, Jun‐Jie Qiao, Mikhail Gromov, Eduardo Morais, S. Van Rompaey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Two independent approaches for electron density ( n e ) measurements, i.e. Thomson scattering and Stark broadening, are compared against each other in a nanosecond pulsed CH 4 /Ar plasma across a range of conditions (60–500 mbar and 0.5%–2.0% CH 4 ). Reasonable agreement is found between the two techniques up to 0.8 µ s after the plasma pulse, when coherent and incoherent scattering features start to simultaneously appear in the Thomson scattering spectrum. After 2.6 µ s, only incoherent scattering remains, resulting in a more accurate estimation of n e compared to Stark broadening, as the latter suffers from a low signal-to-noise ratio. The maximum n e is proportional to the total gas pressure and varies from 7 × 10 22 m −3 at 60 mbar to 1.4 × 10 23 m −3 at 500 mbar, whereas CH 4 admixing was found to lower the n e . The electron temperature ( T e ), estimated from Thomson scattering spectra, rises from ∼18 000 K to 29 600 K (1.55–2.55 eV) with increasing gas pressure, whilst being mostly independent of the CH 4 admixing ratio. This comparison of the two methods provides guidance to the application of Thomson scattering and Stark broadening in nanosecond pulsed plasmas, highlighting the ranges of experimental conditions and time windows where accurate estimations of n e and T e are feasible.

Journal of Physics D Applied PhysicsVol. 58(37)
University of Antwerp (BE), Chongqing University (CN), Ghent University (BE), Leibniz Institute for Plasma Science and Technology (DE)
Agentschap Innoveren en Ondernemen, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Universiteit Gent
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.