Building a Validity Argument for a New Clinical Reasoning Item Format: A Think-Aloud Interview Study of SHARP Item Response Processes
Findings provide initial validity evidence based on response processes for SHARP item score interpretations and uses. Collection and evaluation of additional validity evidence are needed to bolster the SHARP item validity argument.
Authors
- Christopher Runyon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1207-7390)
- Monica M. Cuddy
- Ulana A. Luciw-Dubas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0876-1060)
- Jennifer Lord (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6616-1526)
- Stephanie Iaccarino
- Polina Harik
- Su Somay
- Rachel Swym
Institutions
- Associated Press (US)
- Novem (Netherlands) (NL)
- Zero to Three (US)
- Seattle University (US)
- Delaware County Community College (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Academic Medicine
- Published
- 2025-08-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000006221
- Primary Topic
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00